Gene expression assay and Watson for Oncology for optimization of treatment in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer

被引:13
|
作者
Kim, Yun Yeong [1 ]
Oh, Se Jeong [2 ]
Chun, Yong Soon [1 ]
Lee, Woon Kee [3 ]
Park, Heung Kyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Coll Med, Gil Med Ctr, Dept Surg,Breast Canc Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ, St Marys Hosp, Breast Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Incheon, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Gil Med Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; RECURRENCE SCORE; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; DISTANT RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; PRIMARY THERAPY; ONCOTYPE DX; TAMOXIFEN; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0200100
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Personalized treatment for cancer patients is a hot topic of debate, particularly the decision to initiate chemotherapy in patients with Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative tumors in the early stages of breast cancer (BC). Owing to significant advancements in information technology (IT) and genomics, clinicians are increasingly attaining therapeutic goals rapidly and safely by effectively differentiating patient subsets that require chemotherapy. IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) is a cognitive computing system employed by clinicians to provide evidence-based treatment options for cancer. WFO aids in clinical diagnosis, with claims that it may be superior in performance to human clinicians. The current study was based on the hypothesis that WFO alone cannot effectively determine whether or not chemotherapy is essential for the subset of ER-positive, HER2-negative BC patients. Patients and methods From December 2015 to July 2017, 95 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative BC subjected to treatment were retrospectively examined using WFO, and outputs compared to real clinical practice. Treatment options were suggested by WFO, and WFO recommendations calculated both with and without data from the gene expression assay (GEA). Results WFO without GEA was unable to determine the groups of patients that did not require chemotherapy. Concordant therapeutic recommendations between real clinical practice and WFO without GEA were obtained for 23.2% of the patient group. On the other hand, the results of WFO with GEA showed good clinical applicability. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of WFO with GEA were 100%, 80%, 61% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions Our collective findings indicate that WFO without the gene expression assay has limited clinical utility.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elacestrant for ER-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer
    Hageman, Elizabeth
    Lussier, Mia E.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 58 (08) : 849 - 856
  • [2] Elacestrant in advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Kuenzell, Judith Lorenz
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2023, 83 (01) : 16 - 16
  • [3] Challenges in the management of advanced, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Christopher D. Hart
    Ilenia Migliaccio
    Luca Malorni
    Cristina Guarducci
    Laura Biganzoli
    Angelo Di Leo
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2015, 12 : 541 - 552
  • [4] Palbociclib and letrozole for ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer
    Abraham, Jame
    Mechcatie, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY AND SUPPORTIVE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 13 (03): : 83 - 86
  • [5] Challenges in the management of advanced, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Hart, Christopher D.
    Migliaccio, Ilenia
    Malorni, Luca
    Guarducci, Cristina
    Biganzoli, Laura
    Di Leo, Angelo
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 12 (09) : 541 - 552
  • [6] Endocrine therapy for ER-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Reinert, Tomas
    de Paula, Bruno
    Shafaee, Maryam Nemati
    Souza, Pedro Henrique
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    Bines, Jose
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 (03)
  • [7] CD133 Expression in ER-positive/HER2-negative Breast Cancer is Prognostic for Survival
    Huang, J.
    Oshi, M.
    Takabe, K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 1) : S57 - S57
  • [8] The NEOLETRIB trial: neoadjuvant treatment with Letrozole and Ribociclib in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Fjermeros, Kamilla
    Ghannoum, Salim
    Geisler, Stephanie B.
    Bhargava, Sameer
    Tahiri, Andliena
    Klajic, Jovana
    Luders, Torben
    Fongard, Marie
    Nawaz, Meh Sameen
    Bosnjak-Olsen, Tatjana
    Buvarp, Unn-Cathrin Edvardsen
    Johanna Rosenskiold, Aino Katri
    Nguyen, Nam Thi
    Sletbak, Tone Tysko
    Seyedzadeh, Manouchehr
    Selsas, Knut
    Porojnicu, Alina Carmen
    Skjerven, Helle Kristine
    Hovda, Tone
    Sahlberg, Kristine Kleivi
    Torland, Lilly Anne
    Lyngra, Marianne
    Hammarstrom, Clara Louise
    Honigsperger, Elma Bahonjic
    Noone, John Christopher
    Mathiassen, Silje
    Hurtado, Antoni
    Goel, Shom
    Koff, Andrew
    Tekpli, Xavier
    Kristensen, Vessela N.
    Geisler, Juergen
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 (32) : 2457 - 2466
  • [9] Treatment Outcomes according to the EndoPredict Score in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer
    Jung, Wonguen
    Kim, Kyubo
    Moon, Byung-In
    BREAST CARE, 2022, 17 (06) : 561 - 566
  • [10] Novel Endocrine Therapy Agents in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
    Hamilton, Erika P.
    Rugo, Hope S.
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (03) : 125 - 127