Bacterial Quorum Sensing and Microbial Community Interactions

被引:454
作者
Abisado, Rhea G. [1 ]
Benomar, Saida [1 ]
Klaus, Jennifer R. [1 ]
Dandekar, Ajai A. [2 ]
Chandler, Josephine R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Mol Biosci, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Microbiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
MBIO | 2018年 / 9卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
quorum sensing; antibiotics; coculture; competition; cooperation; COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING; LABORATORY COCULTURE MODEL; CYSTIC-FIBROSIS PATIENTS; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA; TO-CELL COMMUNICATION; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; HOMOSERINE-LACTONE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; VIBRIO-FISCHERI; CHROMOBACTERIUM-VIOLACEUM;
D O I
10.1128/mBio.02331-17
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Many bacteria use a cell-cell communication system called quorum sensing to coordinate population density-dependent changes in behavior. Quorum sensing involves production of and response to diffusible or secreted signals, which can vary substantially across different types of bacteria. In many species, quorum sensing modulates virulence functions and is important for pathogenesis. Over the past half-century, there has been a significant accumulation of knowledge of the molecular mechanisms, signal structures, gene regulons, and behavioral responses associated with quorum-sensing systems in diverse bacteria. More recent studies have focused on understanding quorum sensing in the context of bacterial sociality. Studies of the role of quorum sensing in cooperative and competitive microbial interactions have revealed how quorum sensing coordinates interactions both within a species and between species. Such studies of quorum sensing as a social behavior have relied on the development of "synthetic ecological" models that use nonclonal bacterial populations. In this review, we discuss some of these models and recent advances in understanding how microbes might interact with one another using quorum sensing. The knowledge gained from these lines of investigation has the potential to guide studies of microbial sociality in natural settings and the design of new medicines and therapies to treat bacterial infections.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quorum-sensing and cheating in bacterial biofilms
    Popat, Roman
    Crusz, Shanika A.
    Messina, Marco
    Williams, Paul
    West, Stuart A.
    Diggle, Stephen P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 279 (1748) : 4765 - 4771
  • [22] Interfering with Bacterial Quorum Sensing
    Reuter, Kerstin
    Steinbach, Anke
    Helms, Volkhard
    PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 8
  • [23] Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Network Architectures
    Ng, Wai-Leung
    Bassler, Bonnie L.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 2009, 43 : 197 - 222
  • [24] Impacts of Quorum Sensing on Microbial Metabolism and Human Health
    Yong, Yang-Chun
    Zhong, Jian-Jiang
    FUTURE TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 131 : 25 - 61
  • [25] Interactions between quorum sensing/quorum quenching and virulence genes may affect coral health by regulating symbiotic bacterial community
    Xu, Meiting
    Lyu, Yihua
    Cheng, Keke
    Zhang, Boya
    Cai, Zhonghua
    Chen, Guofu
    Zhou, Jin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 238
  • [26] Quorum sensing inhibitors: a patent review
    Jiang, Tianyu
    Li, Minyong
    EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 2013, 23 (07) : 867 - 894
  • [27] Quorum Sensing in Marine Microbial Environments
    Hmelo, Laura R.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL 9, 2017, 9 : 257 - 281
  • [28] Role of bacterial quorum sensing in plant growth promotion
    Singh, Aparna Anil
    Singh, Anil Kumar
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2025, 41 (01)
  • [29] Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing: fidelity in bioremediation technology
    Mangwani, Neelam
    Kumari, Supriya
    Das, Surajit
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND GENETIC ENGINEERING REVIEWS, VOL 32, ISSUE 1-2, 2016, 32 (1-2): : 43 - 73
  • [30] Review: Inhibition of bacterial quorum sensing by plant extracts
    Yarmolinsky, Ludmila
    Bronstein, Moshe
    Gorelick, Jonathan
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES, 2015, 62 (04) : 294 - 297