Upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation versus mobilization and exercise in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multi-center randomized clinical trial

被引:87
作者
Dunning, James R. [1 ,2 ]
Butts, Raymond [3 ]
Mourad, Firas [4 ]
Young, Ian [5 ]
Fernandez-de-las Penas, Cesar [6 ]
Hagins, Marshall [7 ]
Stanislawski, Thomas [8 ]
Donley, Jonathan [3 ]
Buck, Dustin [9 ]
Hooks, Todd R. [10 ]
Cleland, Joshua A. [11 ]
机构
[1] Alabama Phys Therapy & Acupuncture, Montgomery, AL USA
[2] Nova SE Univ, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
[3] Res Phys Therapy Specialists, Columbia, SC USA
[4] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcon, Spain
[5] Spine & Sport, Savannah, GA USA
[6] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Dept Phys Therapy Occupat Therapy Rehabil & Phys, Alcorcon, Spain
[7] Long Isl Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Brooklyn, NY USA
[8] Back To Hlth, Brooklyn, NY USA
[9] Cutting Edge Orthoped, Gilbert, AZ USA
[10] Champ Sports Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[11] Franklin Pierce Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Manchester, NH USA
关键词
Cervicogenic headache; Spinal manipulation; Mobilization; High velocity low amplitude thrust; NECK-DISABILITY-INDEX; FLEXION-ROTATION TEST; SPINAL MANIPULATION; MANUAL THERAPY; THRUST MANIPULATION; ADVERSE EVENTS; RATING-SCALE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ARTERIAL DYSFUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-016-0912-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although commonly utilized interventions, no studies have directly compared the effectiveness of cervical and thoracic manipulation to mobilization and exercise in individuals with cervicogenic headache (CH). The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of manipulation to mobilization and exercise in individuals with CH. Methods: One hundred and ten participants (n = 110) with CH were randomized to receive both cervical and thoracic manipulation (n = 58) or mobilization and exercise (n = 52). The primary outcome was headache intensity as measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Secondary outcomes included headache frequency, headache duration, disability as measured by the Neck Disability Index (NDI), medication intake, and the Global Rating of Change (GRC). The treatment period was 4 weeks with follow-up assessment at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months after initial treatment session. The primary aim was examined with a 2-way mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA), with treatment group (manipulation versus mobilization and exercise) as the between subjects variable and time (baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks and 3 months) as the within subjects variable. Results: The 2X4 ANOVA demonstrated that individuals with CH who received both cervical and thoracic manipulation experienced significantly greater reductions in headache intensity (p < 0.001) and disability (p < 0.001) than those who received mobilization and exercise at a 3-month follow-up. Individuals in the upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation group also experienced less frequent headaches and shorter duration of headaches at each follow-up period (p < 0.001 for all). Additionally, patient perceived improvement was significantly greater at 1 and 4-week follow-up periods in favor of the manipulation group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Six to eight sessions of upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation were shown to be more effective than mobilization and exercise in patients with CH, and the effects were maintained at 3 months.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Vertebral Manipulation
[2]  
Anthony M, 2000, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V18, pS59
[3]  
Beffa R., 2004, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, V27, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.12.014
[4]   The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) [J].
Bes, Andre ;
Kunkel, Robert ;
Lance, James W. ;
Nappi, Giuseppe ;
Pfaffenrath, Volker ;
Rose, Frank Clifford ;
Schoenberg, Bruce S. ;
Soyka, Dieter ;
Tfelt-Hansen, Peer ;
Welch, K. Michael A. ;
Wilkinson, Marica ;
Olesen, Jes ;
Bousser, Marie-Germaine ;
Diener, Hans-Christoph ;
Dodick, David ;
First, Michael ;
Goadsby, Peter J. ;
Goebel, Hartmut ;
Lainez, Miguel J. A. ;
Lance, James W. ;
Lipton, Richard B. ;
Nappi, Giuseppe ;
Sakai, Fumihiko ;
Schoenen, Jean ;
Silberstein, Stephen D. ;
Steiner, Timothy J. ;
Olesen, Jes ;
Bendtsen, Lars ;
Dodick, David ;
Ducros, Anne ;
Evers, Stefan ;
First, Michael ;
Goadsby, Peter J. ;
Hershey, Andrew ;
Katsarava, Zaza ;
Levin, Morris ;
Pascual, Julio ;
Russell, Michael B. ;
Schwedt, Todd ;
Steiner, Timothy J. ;
Tassorelli, Cristina ;
Terwindt, Gisela M. ;
Vincent, Maurice ;
Wang, Shuu-Jiun ;
Olesen, J. ;
Evers, S. ;
Charles, A. ;
Hershey, A. ;
Lipton, R. ;
First, M. .
CEPHALALGIA, 2013, 33 (09) :629-808
[5]   How spinal manipulative therapy works: Why ask why.? [J].
Bialosky, Joel E. ;
George, Steven Z. ;
Bishop, Mark D. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 38 (06) :293-295
[6]   The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A comprehensive model [J].
Bialosky, Joel E. ;
Bishop, Mark D. ;
Price, Don D. ;
Robinson, Michael E. ;
George, Steven Z. .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2009, 14 (05) :531-538
[7]   Immediate reduction in temporal sensory summation after thoracic spinal manipulation [J].
Bishop, Mark D. ;
Beneciuk, Jason M. ;
George, Steven Z. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (05) :440-446
[8]   Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment [J].
Bogduk, Nikolai ;
Govind, Jayantilal .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2009, 8 (10) :959-968
[9]   Spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization influence different axial sensory beds [J].
Bolton, PS ;
Budgell, BS .
MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2006, 66 (02) :258-262
[10]   Effectiveness of manual therapies: The UK evidence report [J].
Bronfort G. ;
Haas M. ;
Evans R. ;
Leininger B. ;
Triano J. .
Chiropractic & Osteopathy, 18 (1)