Subject-specific estimation of central aortic blood pressure via system identification: preliminary in-human experimental study

被引:24
作者
Fazeli, Nima [1 ]
Kim, Chang-Sei [1 ]
Rashedi, Mohammad [2 ]
Chappell, Alyssa [2 ]
Wang, Shaohua [2 ]
MacArthur, Roderick [2 ]
McMurtry, M. Sean [2 ]
Finegan, Barry [2 ]
Hahn, Jin-Oh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Central aortic blood pressure; System identification; Cardiovascular monitoring; Physiological systems modeling; Physiological signal processing; PREDICTS CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; WAVE-FORM; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11517-014-1185-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper demonstrates preliminary in-human validity of a novel subject-specific approach to estimation of central aortic blood pressure (CABP) from peripheral circulatory waveforms. In this "Individualized Transfer Function" (ITF) approach, CABP is estimated in two steps. First, the circulatory dynamics of the cardiovascular system are determined via model-based system identification, in which an arterial tree model is characterized based on the circulatory waveform signals measured at the body's extremity locations. Second, CABP waveform is estimated by de-convolving peripheral circulatory waveforms from the arterial tree model. The validity of the ITF approach was demonstrated using experimental data collected from 13 cardiac surgery patients. Compared with the invasive peripheral blood pressure (BP) measurements, the ITF approach yielded significant reduction in errors associated with the estimation of CABP, including 1.9-2.6 mmHg (34-42 %) reduction in BP waveform errors (p < 0.05) as well as 5.8-9.1 mmHg (67-76 %) and 6.0-9.7 mmHg (78-85 %) reductions in systolic and pulse pressure (SP and PP) errors (p < 0.05). It also showed modest but significant improvement over the generalized transfer function approach, including 0.1 mmHg (2.6 %) reduction in BP waveform errors as well as 0.7 (20 %) and 5.0 mmHg (75 %) reductions in SP and PP errors (p < 0.05).
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 904
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[31]   Carotid pressure is a better predictor of coronary artery disease severity than brachial pressure [J].
Waddell, TK ;
Dart, AM ;
Medley, TL ;
Cameron, JD ;
Kingwell, BA .
HYPERTENSION, 2001, 38 (04) :927-931
[32]   A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method [J].
Wassertheurer, S. ;
Kropf, J. ;
Weber, T. ;
van der Giet, M. ;
Baulmann, J. ;
Ammer, M. ;
Hametner, B. ;
Mayer, C. C. ;
Eber, B. ;
Magometschnigg, D. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2010, 24 (08) :498-504
[33]   Radial artery tonometry: Moderately accurate but unpredictable technique of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement [J].
Weiss, BM ;
Spahn, DR ;
Rahmig, H ;
Rohling, R ;
Pasch, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (03) :405-411
[34]   Arterial pressure transfer characteristics: effects of travel time [J].
Westerhof, Berend E. ;
Guelen, Ilja ;
Stok, Wim J. ;
Wesseling, Karel H. ;
Spaan, Jos A. E. ;
Westerhof, Nico ;
Bos, Willem Jan ;
Stergiopulos, Nikos .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 292 (02) :H800-H807
[35]   Similarities and differences between augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in the assessment of arterial stiffness [J].
Yasmin ;
Brown, MJ .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 92 (10) :595-600