Lymph node sonography versus palpation for detecting recurrent disease in patients with malignant melanoma

被引:41
作者
Binder, M [1 ]
Kittler, H [1 ]
Steiner, A [1 ]
Dorffner, R [1 ]
Wolff, K [1 ]
Pehamberger, H [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV VIENNA,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,A-1090 VIENNA,AUSTRIA
关键词
melanoma secondary; neoplasms epidemiology; follow-up-studies incidence; lymph nodes ultrasonography lymphatic metastasis; neoplasm staging; retrospective studies; sensitivity and specificity; time factors;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00177-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of lymph node palpation versus high resolution lymph node sonography for the detection of lymph node metastases in patients with malignant melanoma. We retrospectively evaluated 2256 pairwise lymph node examinations of the cervical, axillary and inguinal region by palpation and sonography in 264 patients with resected melanomas greater than 0.75 mm of invasion thickness. Lymph node metastases occurred in 50 patients (19%) which were detected in 38 (76%) by both methods in agreement. In 7 cases (14%) palpation failed, in 3 cases (6%) sonography failed and in 2 cases both methods failed to identify metastases. The overall sensitivity of detecting metastatic disease was 82% for palpation and 90% for sonography which was statistically not different. The overall specificity by sonography (99%) was significantly better than for lymph node palpation (88%). Taking into account the results of this analysis, we conclude that patients with a negative result by lymph node palpation do not need further sonography for verification. However, any suspect result by palpation should be additionally evaluated by lymph node sonography in order to rule in or out metastatic disease. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1805 / 1808
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   STATISTICS NOTES - DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 - SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6943) :1552-1552
[2]  
BALCH CM, 1992, CUTANEOUS MELANOMA C
[4]   PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF SIZE OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN PATIENTS WITH CUTANEOUS MELANOMA [J].
BUZAID, AC ;
TINOCO, LA ;
JENDIROBA, D ;
TU, ZN ;
LEE, JJ ;
LEGHA, SS ;
ROSS, MI ;
BALCH, CM ;
BENJAMIN, RS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (09) :2361-2368
[5]  
FORNAGE BD, 1989, J ULTRAS MED, V8, P421
[6]   Evaluation of the American Academy of Dermatology's national skin cancer early detection and screening program [J].
Koh, HK ;
Norton, LA ;
Geller, AC ;
Sun, T ;
Rigel, DS ;
Miller, DR ;
Sikes, RG ;
Vigeland, K ;
Bachenberg, EU ;
Menon, PA ;
Billon, SF ;
Goldberg, G ;
Scarborough, DA ;
Ramsdell, WM ;
Muscarella, VA ;
Lew, RA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 34 (06) :971-978
[7]  
KRAUS W, 1985, HAUTARZT, V36, P386
[8]  
LOHNERT JD, 1988, RADIOLOGE, V28, P317
[9]  
LOOSE R, 1992, ULTRASOUND DERMATOLO, P93
[10]   The melanoma epidemic - Excess exposure to ultraviolet light is established as major risk factor [J].
Mackie, RM ;
Marks, R ;
Green, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7042) :1362-1363