Automatic breast ultrasound image segmentation: A survey

被引：183
作者：
Xian, Min [1 ]
Zhang, Yingtao [3 ]
Cheng, H. D. [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Fei [2 ]
Zhang, Boyu [2 ]
Ding, Jianrui [3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Comp Sci, Idaho Falls, ID 83402 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
来源：
PATTERN RECOGNITION | 2018年 / 79卷
关键词：
Breast ultrasound (BUS) images; Breast cancer; Segmentation; Benchmark; Early detection; Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD); GEODESIC ACTIVE CONTOURS; GRAPH-BASED SEGMENTATION; LEVEL SET EVOLUTION; DEEP NEURAL-NETWORK; LESION SEGMENTATION; ENERGY MINIMIZATION; TUMOR SEGMENTATION; COMPETITION ALGORITHM; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; SNAKE MODEL;
D O I：
10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.012
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death among women worldwide. In clinical routine, automatic breast ultrasound (BUS) image segmentation is very challenging and essential for cancer diagnosis and treatment planning. Many BUS segmentation approaches have been studied in the last two decades, and have been proved to be effective on private datasets. Currently, the advancement of BUS image segmentation seems to meet its bottleneck. The improvement of the performance is increasingly challenging, and only few new approaches were published in the last several years. It is the time to look at the field by reviewing previous approaches comprehensively and to investigate the future directions. In this paper, we study the basic ideas, theories, pros and cons of the approaches, group them into categories, and extensively review each category in depth by discussing the principles, application issues, and advantages/disadvantages. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：340 / 355
页数：16
相关论文
共 178 条
[21]  
[Anonymous], 1956, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, DOI 10.4153/CJM-1956-045-5
[22]  
[Anonymous], P SPIE MI
[23]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Proceedings of Graphicon, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.AJ0D0.2004.07.036
[24]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[25]   Multiple resolution Bayesian segmentation of ultrasound images [J].
Ashton, EA ;
Parker, KJ .
ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 1995, 17 (04) :291-304
[26]  
BESAG J, 1986, J R STAT SOC B, V48, P259
[27]  
Beucher S., 1993, MATH MORPHOLOGY IMAG, V34, P433, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781482277234-12
[28]  
Boser B. E., 1992, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, P144, DOI 10.1145/130385.130401
[29]   Segmentation of ultrasound images - multiresolution 2D and 3D algorithm based on global and local statistics [J].
Boukerroui, D ;
Baskurt, A ;
Noble, JA ;
Basset, O .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2003, 24 (4-5) :779-790
[30]  
Boukerroui D, 1998, Eur J Ultrasound, V8, P135, DOI 10.1016/S0929-8266(98)00062-7
12345678910