An AHP-Based Approach in the Early Design Evaluation via Usability Goals

被引:0
作者
Hoo, Meei Hao [1 ]
Jaafar, Azizah [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
来源
ADVANCES IN VISUAL INFORMATICS | 2013年 / 8237卷
关键词
usability goal; early design evaluation; usability evaluation; quantitative approach; analytic hierarchy process;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The usability engineering process has indicated the importance of setting usability criteria and a measureable level for important goals. Without goal-oriented practice, novice or inexperienced designers do not know how to deliver usable and quality system and would unreasonably follow what they have seen or used before. This paper presents a quantitative basis for selecting and prioritizing design goals or usability goals, thereafter selecting the best prototype relative to the usability goals. The proposed method consists of two main phase, namely: the prioritizing goals phase and the user evaluation phase. The objective of the prioritizing goal phase is to set priorities of the usability goals using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The second phase involves users in the quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods to evaluate the prototypes using quantitative criteria and thereafter select the best prototype. The level of importance of usability goals assists designers to decide which alternative designs meet the most important usability goals. A case study of prototype selection in students' design assignment is presented, and the proposed approach is applied to facilitate their design decision during prototype development and evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 706
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multicriteria Decision-Making System for Supplier Selection Considering Risk: A Computational Fuzzy AHP-Based Approach
    Fagundes, M. V. C.
    Keler, A. C.
    Teles, E. O.
    Vieira de Melo, S. A. B.
    Freires, F. G. M.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2021, 19 (09) : 1564 - 1572
  • [32] AHP-Based Evaluation Model for Optimal Selection Process of Patching Materials for Concrete Repair: Focused on Quantitative Requirements
    Do, Jeong-Yun
    Kim, Doo-Kie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS, 2012, 6 (02) : 87 - 100
  • [33] Usability Evaluation of Packaging Design Based on Eye Movement Experiment
    Zhao, Weijun
    Zheng, Linyan
    Wang, Tian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH (ICSSR 2013), 2013, 64 : 626 - 629
  • [34] Evaluation of urban river landscape design rationality based on AHP
    Qiao Lifang
    Zhang Yichuan
    Cao Wei
    WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 1 (04) : 75 - 81
  • [35] Evaluation of urban river landscape design rationality based on AHP
    Qiao Lifang
    WaterScienceandEngineering, 2008, 1 (04) : 75 - 81
  • [36] Fuzzy Evaluation Approach of Road Traffic Safety Based on AHP
    Shi, Huawang
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE BIOMEDICAL INFORMATION ENGINEERING (FBIE 2009), 2009, : 394 - 397
  • [37] AHP-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for monitoring health management practices in smart healthcare system
    Pant, Sangeeta
    Garg, Priya
    Kumar, Anuj
    Ram, Mangey
    Kumar, Akshay
    Sharma, Hitesh Kumar
    Klochkov, Yury
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 15 (04) : 1444 - 1455
  • [38] A GIS- and AHP-based approach to map fire risk: a case study of Kuan Kreng peat swamp forest, Thailand
    Nuthammachot, Narissara
    Stratoulias, Dimitris
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 36 (02) : 212 - 225
  • [39] Evaluation of factors influencing knowledge sharing based on a fuzzy AHP approach
    Lin, Hsiu-Fen
    Lee, Hsuan-Shih
    Wang, Da Wei
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2009, 35 (01) : 25 - 44
  • [40] An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Shang, Jennifer S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 214 (03) : 703 - 715