Coalitions Towards the Carbon Tax in the Swedish Heating Sector

被引:3
作者
Higa, Cecilia [1 ]
Cunha, Marcelo [2 ]
Silveira, Semida [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Mech Engn, Dept Energy Syst Planning, BR-13083860 Campinas, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Econ, BR-13083857 Campinas, Brazil
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Energy Technol, S-11428 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
energy policy; advocacy coalition framework; carbon tax; Swedish heating sector; ENERGY; FRAMEWORK; SWEDEN; POLICY; BIOENERGY; TAXATION;
D O I
10.3390/su12208530
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The carbon tax is a cornerstone of the climate policy in Sweden. Historically, it has played a central role in the replacement of fossil fuels in the heating sector. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the policy-making process that led to the formulation and adoption of the carbon tax in the Swedish heating sector, from 1980 to 1991. We used the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), according to which policy actors form coalitions based on shared beliefs. Drawing from both literature and empirical experiences gathered through in-depth interviews, we identified supporting and opposing coalitions that diverged in their views concerning bioenergy development and the potential impact of the carbon tax. This study illustrates the complex conditions for introduction of environmental taxes and expansion of new industries, particularly when established businesses perceive the new activities as a threat. The Swedish experience shows that countries can progress by exploring internal synergies and innovative policy designs, despite potential resistance of established constituencies. The successful adoption of the carbon tax in the Swedish heating sector serves as inspiration for policymakers in other sectors and countries, as they contemplate policies to promote the decarbonization of the energy system.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What is the 'problem' of gender inequality represented to be in the Swedish forest sector?
    Ville, Alizee
    Wong, Grace
    Aceituno, Amanda Jimenez
    Downing, Andrea
    Karambiri, Mawa
    Brockhaus, Maria
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2023, 140 : 46 - 55
  • [32] Monopoly regulation when customers need to make sunk investments: evidence from the Swedish district heating sector
    Darryl Biggar
    Matthieu Glachant
    Magnus Söderberg
    Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2018, 54 : 14 - 40
  • [33] Monopoly regulation when customers need to make sunk investments: evidence from the Swedish district heating sector
    Biggar, Darryl
    Glachant, Matthieu
    Soderberg, Magnus
    JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2018, 54 (01) : 14 - 40
  • [34] Efficiency-equity trade-off in the Irish carbon tax: A CGE investigation of mixed revenue recycling schemes
    de Bruin, Kelly
    Yakut, Aykut Mert
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2024, 134
  • [35] Towards carbon neutrality in the agri-food sector: Drivers and barriers
    Acampora, Alessia
    Ruini, Luca
    Mattia, Giovanni
    Pratesi, Carlo Alberto
    Lucchetti, Maria Claudia
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 189
  • [36] Bunching and non-bunching at kink points of the Swedish tax schedule
    Bastani, Spencer
    Selin, Hakan
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2014, 109 : 36 - 49
  • [37] THREE DECADES OF BIOMASS USE IN SWEDISH DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEMS
    Ericsson, Karin
    Werner, Sven
    PAPERS OF THE 23RD EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2015, : 519 - 528
  • [38] Taxation as Regulation: Carbon Tax, Health Care Tax, Bank Tax and Other Regulatory Taxes
    Avi-Yonah, Reuven S.
    ACCOUNTING ECONOMICS AND LAW-A CONVIVIUM, 2011, 1 (01)
  • [39] Asymmetric Interest Group Mobilization and Party Coalitions in US Tax Politics
    Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander
    Skocpol, Theda
    STUDIES IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 29 (02) : 235 - 249
  • [40] Macro and Structural Effects of Carbon Tax in China Based on the ECGE Model
    Wu, Qunli
    Li, Chunxiang
    Zhang, Hongjie
    Tian, Jinyu
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2019, 28 (04): : 2449 - 2463