Post-disaster sequential recovery planning for water distribution systems using topological and hydraulic metrics

被引:13
作者
Mazumder, Ram K. [1 ]
Salman, Abdullahi M. [2 ]
Li, Yue [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 2104 Adelbert Rd,Bingham Bldg,Room 231, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Functionality; hydraulic availability; network efficiency; pipelines; recovery; resilience; water distribution systems;
D O I
10.1080/15732479.2020.1864415
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Multiple pipeline failures in water distribution systems (WDS) caused by natural hazards such as earthquakes can significantly reduce the functionality of the systems. After a natural disaster, a quick recovery of WDS is desirable to ensure that critical facilities have access to clean water. However, experience from recent disasters has shown that the recovery period for WDS can be long. The recovery period depends on various factors, such as available resources, budget, etc. As such, all the failed pipelines cannot be repaired at the same time. Hence, utilities need to prioritise damaged pipelines and perform the repair in such a way that the functionality of the WDS is optimised. Post-event system functionality gain may vary significantly depending on the choice of sequential recovery paths. Unlike other infrastructures, the functionality of WDS is not only dependent on topological integrity but also on hydraulic performance. In this study, a post-disaster recovery planning model for WDS is proposed. The restoration process is modelled in terms of topological efficiency, hydraulic resilience and hydraulic availability. The optimal recovery sequence is determined based on the recovery effectiveness estimated by the area under each recovery sequence curves. The proposed method is illustrated for a moderate size WDS.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 743
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability [J].
Adachi, Takao ;
Ellingwood, Bruce R. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (01) :78-88
[2]  
Al-Zahrani M.A., 2005, J KING SAUD U ENG SC, V18, DOI 10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30822-5
[3]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[4]   Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities [J].
Chang, SE ;
Shinozuka, M .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2004, 20 (03) :739-755
[5]   Post-Earthquake Restoration Simulation Model for Water Supply Networks [J].
Choi, Jeongwook ;
Yoo, Do Guen ;
Kang, Doosun .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
[6]  
Cimellaro G., 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, pC4015014
[7]  
Crowl DA., 2001, CHEM PROCESS SAFETY
[8]   Water System Service Categories, Post-Earthquake Interaction, and Restoration Strategies [J].
Davis, Craig A. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (04) :1487-1509
[9]  
DIAO K, 2016, WATER RES, V106
[10]  
Farahmandfar Z., 2015, Proceedings of the Pipelines 2015 Conference. Recent Advances in Underground Pipeline Engineering and Construction, P756