Impact of different chicken meat production systems on consumers' purchase perception

被引:39
作者
Pinto da Rosa, P. [1 ]
Pio avila, B. [2 ]
Dame Veber Angelo, I. [3 ]
Garavaglia Chesini, R. [4 ]
Albandes Fernandes, T. [1 ]
da Silva Camacho, J. [1 ]
Bugoni, M. [4 ]
Roll, V. F. B. [1 ]
Gularte, M. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas, Anim Sci Dept, Post Grad Program Anim Sci PPGZ, Capao Do Leao, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Pelotas, Post Grad Program Food Sci & Technol PPGCTA, Food Sci & Technol, Capao Do Leao, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Anim Sci Grad Program PPGZ, Anim Sci Depatment, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Anim Sci Dept, Grad Program Anim Nutr & Prod PPGNPA, Pirassununga, Brazil
关键词
Animal welfare; meat quality; free range; temporal dominance of sensations;
D O I
10.1080/00071668.2020.1857335
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
1. The objective of this study was to evaluate specific sensory attributes of chicken meat from different production systems to evaluate the emotional responses related to information available on the packages, as well as to investigate consumers' perceptions regarding this information. 2. The survey was conducted using the Temporal Dominance of Sensations analysis, which identified differences in taste and texture between samples belonging to the organic, conventional and natural systems. 3. The specific emotional lexicon for chicken meat, defined by the consumers through the EmoSemio questionnaire, provided a list of positive emotions for packages that indicated some type of information about the rearing or feeding system. 4. The qualitative data obtained using the Attitude Questionnaire demonstrated that packaging and labelling are not self-explanatory, posing more doubts for the consumer at the time of purchase. It was shown that packaging and labelling were extrinsic attributes that influenced the evaluation and acceptability of products. Besides that, consumers were interested in buying products that attest to animal welfare, provided that the price is attractive. 5. Poultry companies can have a greater chance of making their products more attractive if they learn more about the attitude and expectations of the consumer in relation to the products, as well as the importance of the animal welfare attributes that are communicated.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 395
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review [J].
Aertsens, Joris ;
Verbeke, Wim ;
Mondelaers, Koen ;
Van Huylenbroeck, Guido .
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2009, 111 (10) :1140-1167
[2]   The relationship between food label use and dietary intake in adults: A systematic review [J].
Anastasiou, Kim ;
Miller, Michelle ;
Dickinson, Kacie .
APPETITE, 2019, 138 :280-291
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011-2020, DOI DOI 10.1787/AGR_OUTLOOK-2019-EN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, NORMATIVE INSTRUCTIO, V17
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, FARMNEWS 1025
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, MEAT QUALITY GENETIC
[7]   Analysis of the perception and behaviour of consumers regarding probiotic dairy products [J].
Avila, Bianca Pio ;
da Rosa, Patricia Pinto ;
Fernandes, Tiago Albandes ;
Chesini, Rodrigo Garavaglia ;
Sedrez, Pamela Aristimunho ;
Timm de Oliveira, Allan Patrick ;
Mota, Gilliany Nessy ;
Gularte, Marcia Arocha ;
Buttow Roll, Victor Fernando .
INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2020, 106
[8]   Towards a theory of values-based labeling [J].
Barham E. .
Agriculture and Human Values, 2002, 19 (4) :349-360
[9]   Behavior as welfare indicator for the rearing of broilers in an enriched husbandry environmentd-A field study [J].
Bergmann, Shana ;
Schwarzer, Angela ;
Wilutzky, Katharina ;
Louton, Helen ;
Bachmeier, Josef ;
Schmidt, Paul ;
Erhard, Michael ;
Rauch, Elke .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY BEHAVIOR-CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH, 2017, 19 :90-101
[10]   Effect of organic production system on broiler carcass and meat quality [J].
Castellini, C ;
Mugnai, C ;
Dal Bosco, A .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2002, 60 (03) :219-225