Errors induced by spectral measurement positions and instrument noise in soil organic carbon prediction using vis-NIR on intact soil

被引:7
作者
Sun, Xiao-Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Soil spectroscopy; Error analysis; Sampling positions; Instrument noise; DIFFUSE-REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY; IN-SITU; NEURAL-NETWORK; LEAST-SQUARES; CLAY CONTENT; MOISTURE; FIELD; PROPAGATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114731
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil spectroscopy potentially would become a routine method for the measurement of soil properties in the field on soil cores. However, many factors could lead to errors in the measurement of spectra from intact soil cores. So far, errors induced by spectral measurement positions and instrument noise have rarely been quantified. The present study evaluated these errors based on 160 intact ring core samples collected from 20 profiles in a forest, southwest China. Each ring sample was scanned using a visible near-infrared (vis-NIR) spectrometer at nine evenly distributed positions at both ends of the ring to characterize within-sample variability. In addition, 10 scans were made at each position to characterize instrument error. A position spectrum was then calculated by averaging the 10 scans at each position, while a sample spectrum was calculated by averaging all 180 scans of each sample. The samples were then tested for soil organic carbon (SOC) content using the wet oxidation method. Based on the sample spectra and SOC content, a partial least squares regression (PLSR) model was calibrated. The modeling error was empirically calculated. Each scan, position spectrum, and sample spectrum was then fed into the calibrated PLSR model to predict SOC content, and the prediction results were evaluated for errors induced by instrument noise and different spectral measurement positions. Results showed that the error induced by different spectral measurement positions was about 75% of the modeling error, while the error induced by instrument noise was small and negligible. These three errors in terms of standard error of prediction (SEP) accounted for 18.6%, 23.8% and 1.46% of the average measured SOC content of the samples, respectively. Besides, the error due to different soil core sampling positions was also considerable. In terms of SEP, this error accounted for 12.5% of the average measured SOC content. These quantified error budgets would help to account for uncertainty in the measurement of soil properties using spectroscopy in the field.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GEODERMA
[3]   Critical review of chemometric indicators commonly used for assessing the quality of the prediction of soil attributes by NIR spectroscopy [J].
Bellon-Maurel, Veronique ;
Fernandez-Ahumada, Elvira ;
Palagos, Bernard ;
Roger, Jean-Michel ;
McBratney, Alex .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 29 (09) :1073-1081
[4]   Predicting soil microplastic concentration using vis-NIR spectroscopy [J].
Corradini, Fabio ;
Bartholomeus, Harm ;
Lwanga, Esperanza Huerta ;
Gertsen, Hennie ;
Geissen, Violette .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 650 :922-932
[5]   Error propagation in spectrometric functions of soil organic carbon [J].
Ellinger, Monja ;
Merbach, Ines ;
Werban, Ulrike ;
Liess, Mareike .
SOIL, 2019, 5 (02) :275-288
[6]   Comparison of soil reflectance spectra and calibration models obtained using multiple spectrometers [J].
Ge, Yufeng ;
Morgan, Cristine L. S. ;
Grunwald, Sabine ;
Brown, David J. ;
Sarkhot, Deoyani V. .
GEODERMA, 2011, 161 (3-4) :202-211
[7]   Spectral feature characterization and nitrogen content prediction in soils with different particle sizes and moisture contents [J].
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China ;
不详 .
Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2008, 1 (43-50) :43-50
[8]   Accounting for the effects of water and the environment on proximally sensed vis-NIR soil spectra and their calibrations [J].
Ji, W. ;
Rossel, R. A. Viscarra ;
Shi, Z. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2015, 66 (03) :555-565
[9]   Predicting the dry bulk density of soils across Denmark: Comparison of single-parameter, multi-parameter, and vis-NIR based models [J].
Katuwal, Sheela ;
Knadel, Maria ;
Norgaard, Trine ;
Moldrup, Per ;
Greve, Mogens H. ;
de Jonge, Lis W. .
GEODERMA, 2020, 361
[10]   THE SPECTRAL IMAGE-PROCESSING SYSTEM (SIPS) - INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF IMAGING SPECTROMETER DATA [J].
KRUSE, FA ;
LEFKOFF, AB ;
BOARDMAN, JW ;
HEIDEBRECHT, KB ;
SHAPIRO, AT ;
BARLOON, PJ ;
GOETZ, AFH .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1993, 44 (2-3) :145-163