Comparisons of prediction methods for peak cladding temperature and effective thermal conductivity in spent fuel assemblies of transportation/storage casks

被引:13
作者
Kim, Hyungjin [1 ]
Kwon, Oh Joon [2 ]
Kang, Gyeong-Uk [1 ]
Lee, Dong-Gyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Radioact Waste Agcy, Taejon, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Taejon 305701, South Korea
[3] Korea Nucl Engn & Serv Co, Taejon, South Korea
关键词
Spent fuel; Two-region model; Wooton-Epstein correlation; Transportation/storage cask; Peak cladding temperature; Effective thermal conductivity;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2014.04.004
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
When spent fuel assemblies from the reactor of nuclear power plants (NPPs) are transported or stored, the assemblies are exposed to a variety of environments that can affect the peak cladding temperature. There are three models to calculate the peak cladding temperature of spent fuel assemblies in a cask: Manteufel and Todreas's two-region model, Bahney Lotz's effective thermal conductivity model, and Wooton-Epstein correlation. The peak cladding temperatures of Babcock & Wilcox (B&W) 15 x 15 PWR spent fuel assembly under helium backfill gas were evaluated by using two-dimensional CFD simulation and compared with two models (Wooton-Epstein correlation, two-region model). The peak cladding temperature difference between the two-region model and CFD simulation ranges from -0.2 K to 9 K. Two-region model over-predicts the measured peak cladding temperature that performs in a spent fuel dry storage cask. Therefore the simulation could be used to calculate peak cladding temperature of spent fuel assemblies. Application using CFD simulation was conducted to investigate the peak cladding temperature and effective thermal conductivity of spent fuel assembly used in Korea NPPs: 16 x 16 (CE type) and 17 x 17 (WH type) PWR spent fuel assembly. CFD simulation results are similar to each other, and the difference of temperature drop between the three arrays occurs slightly in all basket wall temperatures. The effective thermal conductivity calculated from the 16 x 16 PWR spent fuel assembly results was more conservative than those for the 17 x 17 array. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 435
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ANSYS Inc, 2013, FLUENT TUT GUID
[2]  
Babcock & Wilcox Fuel Company, 1991, BR 100 100 TON RAIL
[3]  
Bahney R.H., 1996, SPENT NUCL FUEL EFFE
[4]  
Bucholz J.A., 1983, ORNLCSDTM149
[5]  
CRWMS M&O, DET PWR SNF EFF COND
[6]  
FuelSolutions, 2007, WSNF221 FUELSOLUTION
[7]  
Gomez P.E.A., 2005, P ASME PVP C DENV CO
[8]  
Hutchinson B.R., 1986, NUMERICAL HEAT TRANS, V9, P195
[9]  
Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. (KHNP), 2008, SAF AN REP KN 18 SPE
[10]  
Manteufel R.D., 1991, MITNE292 DEP NUCL EN