Attenuation Correction for Flexible Magnetic Resonance Coils in Combined Magnetic Resonance/Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

被引:30
|
作者
Eldib, Mootaz [1 ]
Bini, Jason [1 ,2 ]
Calcagno, Claudia [1 ]
Robson, Philip M. [1 ]
Mani, Venkatesh [1 ,3 ]
Fayad, Zahi A. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Translat & Mol Imaging Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] CUNY City Coll, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10031 USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Cardiol, Zena & Michael Weiner Cardiovasc Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Marie Jose & Henry R Kravis Ctr Cardiovasc Hlth, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; positron emission tomography; attenuation correction; flexible radio frequency coils; BODY PET/MR SCANNER; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; SCATTERED DATA; SURFACE COILS; REGISTRATION; IMAGES; MRI; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182a530f8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction Attenuation correction for magnetic resonance (MR) coils is a new challenge that came about with the development of combined MR and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. This task is difficult because such coils are not directly visible on either PET or MR acquisitions with current combined scanners and are therefore not easily localized in the field of view. This issue becomes more evident when trying to localize flexible MR coils (eg, cardiac or body matrix coil) that change position and shape from patient to patient and from one imaging session to another. In this study, we proposed a novel method to localize and correct for the attenuation and scatter of a flexible MR cardiac coil, using MR fiducial markers placed on the surface of the coil to allow for accurate registration of a template computed tomography (CT)-based attenuation map. Materials and Methods To quantify the attenuation properties of the cardiac coil, a uniform cylindrical water phantom injected with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) was imaged on a sequential MR/PET system with and without the flexible cardiac coil. After establishing the need to correct for the attenuation of the coil, we tested the feasibility of several methods to register a precomputed attenuation map to correct for the attenuation. To accomplish this, MR and CT visible markers were placed on the surface of the cardiac flexible coil. Using only the markers as a driver for registration, the CT image was registered to the reference image through a combination of rigid and deformable registration. The accuracy of several methods was compared for the deformable registration, including B-spline, thin-plate spline, elastic body spline, and volume spline. Finally, we validated our novel approach both in phantom and patient studies. Results The findings from the phantom experiments indicated that the presence of the coil resulted in a 10% reduction in measured 18F-FDG activity when compared with the phantom-only scan. Local underestimation reached 22% in regions of interest close to the coil. Various registration methods were tested, and the volume spline was deemed to be the most accurate, as measured by the Dice similarity metric. The results of our phantom experiments showed that the bias in the 18F-FDG quantification introduced by the presence of the coil could be reduced by using our registration method. An overestimation of only 1.9% of the overall activity for the phantom scan with the coil attenuation map was measured when compared with the baseline phantom scan without coil. A local overestimation of less than 3% was observed in the ROI analysis when using the proposed method to correct for the attenuation of the flexible cardiac coil. Quantitative results from the patient study agreed well with the phantom findings. Conclusions We presented and validated an accurate method to localize and register a CT-based attenuation map to correct for the attenuation and scatter of flexible MR coils. This method may be translated to clinical use to produce quantitatively accurate measurements with the use of flexible MR coils during MR/PET imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance: Present and future
    Kohan, A. A.
    Vercher Conejero, J. L.
    Gaeta, M. C.
    Pelegri Martinez, L.
    Ros, P. R.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR E IMAGEN MOLECULAR, 2013, 32 (03): : 167 - 176
  • [32] Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Nagarajah, James
    Buchbender, Christian
    Hoffmann, Oliver
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt Michael
    Poeppel, Thorsten
    Forsting, Michael
    Quick, Harald H.
    Umutlu, Lale
    Kinner, Sonja
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (08) : 505 - 513
  • [33] Lean body mass correction of standardized uptake value in simultaneous whole-body positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Jochimsen, Thies H.
    Schulz, Jessica
    Busse, Harald
    Werner, Peter
    Schaudinn, Alexander
    Zeisig, Vilia
    Kurch, Lars
    Seese, Anita
    Barthel, Henryk
    Sattler, Bernhard
    Sabri, Osama
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (12): : 4651 - 4664
  • [34] OLIVOPONTOCEREBELLAR ATROPHY STUDIED BY POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    YAMAGUCHI, S
    FUKUYAMA, H
    OGAWA, M
    YAMAUCHI, H
    HARADA, K
    NAKAMURA, S
    KIMURA, J
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1994, 125 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [35] Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance liver parenchyma attenuation correction artifact in secondary hemochromatosis
    Matthews, Robert
    Salerno, Michael Joseph
    Vaska, Paul
    Hindman, Halley
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (01) : 85 - 88
  • [36] Multimodality Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer-Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Positron Emission Tomography
    Raman, Siva P.
    Horton, Karen M.
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (06): : 511 - 522
  • [37] Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technical Review
    Muzic, Raymond F., Jr.
    DiFilippo, Frank P.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 49 (03) : 242 - 254
  • [38] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY OF BAND HETEROTOPIA
    MIURA, K
    WATANABE, K
    MAEDA, N
    MATSUMOTO, A
    KUMAGAI, T
    ITO, K
    KATO, T
    BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 15 (04): : 288 - 290
  • [39] Imaging of transplanted islets by positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography
    Sakata, Naoaki
    Yoshimatsu, Gumpei
    Tsuchiya, Haruyuki
    Aoki, Takeshi
    Mizuma, Masamichi
    Motoi, Fuyuhiko
    Katayose, Yu
    Kodama, Tetsuya
    Egawa, Shinichi
    Unno, Michiaki
    ISLETS, 2013, 5 (05) : 179 - 187
  • [40] The Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Gynecological Malignancies
    Virarkar, Mayur
    Viswanathan, Chitra
    Iyer, Revathy
    de Castro Faria, Silvana
    Morani, Ajaykumar
    Carter, Brett
    Ganeshan, Dhakshinamoorthy
    Elsherif, Sherif
    Bhosale, Priya R.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (06) : 825 - 834