Rating of animal welfare in Marchigiana beef farms in Marche Region

被引:0
作者
Mandolini, N. Aconiti [1 ]
Moscati, L. [1 ]
Dettori, A. [1 ]
Felici, A. [1 ]
Corradini, C. M.
Tirabasso, V.
Marzialetti, A.
Perugini, G. [1 ]
Maresca, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Umbria & Marche, Pesaro, Italy
来源
LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW | 2017年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
Animal welfare; farm's management; innate immunity parameters; SERUM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Introduction - The breeding of Marchigiana cattle breed in the Marche Region, still plays a very important role in the rural realities of the region. In recent decades the methods of breeding of this breed have changed significantly and today, in addition to family farms, there are actually farms of considerable size, which breed this cattle intensively. Aim - It has gone from this variability to investigate any differences between the management of these farms and the level of animal welfare inside them . Material and methods - This aim was reached giving a questionnaire to the breeders of 36 farms asking them to clinical and health aspects, managerial and structural aspects, and the drug management. To each question was assigned a score from 1 to 3. At the same time, blood samples were performed on 270 calves under 6 months of age to evaluate some non-specific immune parameters (serum- amyloid A, haptoglobin, serum lysozyme, complement and bactericidal activities of serum). Results and discussion - According to our classification 15 farms were considered to have good management, 15 an intermediate level of management and 6 mismanagement. The questionnaire also showed that 22 out of 36 companies do not carry out quarantine, only 6 companies make annual checks on the herd even without symptoms. The 67% of farms (n. 24) has reproductive problems, among which the most frequently turns out to be a return to heat (87%). Only 3 companies make use of advice from a nutritionist and only 4 have made the last three therapies based on a complete diagnosis (clinical diagnosis and direct diagnosis of laboratory). It was observed statistically significant association (OR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.6 to 6; p=0.01) between the number of animals in a farm, the enteric diseases and mortality in calves under six months. In companies with a number = 80 of cattle units, the calves had a 3 times greater probability of developing intestinal disease or to die. Regarding the innate immunity parameters we can say that there is no difference between the values registered in the farms with a better or worse management. Conclusions - This shows that despite the selective pressure to which the Marchigiana cattle breed has undergone in the last decade, this bovine still keeps its rustic character that make it suitable to be breed also in the reality in which bacterial and viral loads are particularly high.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 10
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Classification of animal welfare on mink farms differs between three annual production periods
    Henriksen, B. I. F.
    Sorensen, J. T.
    Moller, S. H.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2016, 25 (02) : 265 - 273
  • [32] Investigating the cecal microbiota in broiler poultry farms and its potential relationships with animal welfare
    Di Marcantonio, Lisa
    Marotta, Francesca
    Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri
    Sonntag, Quixi
    Iannetti, Luigi
    Janowicz, Anna
    Di Serafino, Gabriella
    Di Giannatale, Elisabetta
    Garofolo, Giuliano
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 144 : 115 - 125
  • [33] Discrepancies between farmers' perceptions and actual animal welfare conditions on commercial pig farms
    Nadlucnik, Eva
    Golinar Oven, Irena
    Tomazic, Iztok
    Plut, Jan
    Dovc, Alenka
    Stukelj, Marina
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [34] Structural Features, Biosecurity and Animal Welfare Assessment in Sheep Farms in Yozgat Province, Turkiye
    Aslan, A.
    Tufekci, H.
    JOURNAL OF THE HELLENIC VETERINARY MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2025, 75 (04): : 8229 - 8240
  • [35] Self-evaluation of animal welfare by the farmer:: a report of application on Austrian cattle farms
    Ofner, E.
    Schmid, E.
    Schroeck, E.
    Troxler, J.
    Hausleitner, A.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 245 - 248
  • [36] Research Note: Welfare and stress responses of broiler chickens raised in conventional and animal welfare-certified broiler farms
    Kwon, Byung-Yeon
    Lee, Hyun-Gwan
    Jeon, Yong-Sung
    Song, Ju-Yong
    Kim, Sang-Ho
    Kim, Dong-Wook
    Kim, Chan-Ho
    Lee, Kyung-Woo
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2024, 103 (03)
  • [37] Evaluation of bruises as an animal welfare indicator during pre-slaughter of beef cattle
    Romero, Marlyn H.
    Gutierrez, Carolina
    Sanchez, Jorge A.
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2012, 25 (02) : 267 - 275
  • [38] Animal welfare efforts and farm economic outcomes: Evidence from Swedish beef production
    Ahmed, Haseeb
    Emanuelson, Ulf
    Alvasen, Karin
    Berg, Charlotte
    Hultgren, Jan
    Rocklinsberg, Helena
    Hansson, Helena
    AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2023, 52 (03) : 498 - 519
  • [39] An on-farm investigation of beef suckler herds using an animal welfare index (AWI)
    Mickael Mazurek
    Daniel J Prendiville
    Mark A Crowe
    Isabelle Veissier
    Bernadette Earley
    BMC Veterinary Research, 6
  • [40] Animal welfare and gender: a nexus in awareness and preference when choosing fresh beef meat?
    Blanc, S.
    Massaglia, S.
    Borra, D.
    Mosso, A.
    Merlino, V. M.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 19 (01) : 410 - 420