Rating of animal welfare in Marchigiana beef farms in Marche Region

被引:0
|
作者
Mandolini, N. Aconiti [1 ]
Moscati, L. [1 ]
Dettori, A. [1 ]
Felici, A. [1 ]
Corradini, C. M.
Tirabasso, V.
Marzialetti, A.
Perugini, G. [1 ]
Maresca, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Umbria & Marche, Pesaro, Italy
来源
LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW | 2017年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
Animal welfare; farm's management; innate immunity parameters; SERUM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Introduction - The breeding of Marchigiana cattle breed in the Marche Region, still plays a very important role in the rural realities of the region. In recent decades the methods of breeding of this breed have changed significantly and today, in addition to family farms, there are actually farms of considerable size, which breed this cattle intensively. Aim - It has gone from this variability to investigate any differences between the management of these farms and the level of animal welfare inside them . Material and methods - This aim was reached giving a questionnaire to the breeders of 36 farms asking them to clinical and health aspects, managerial and structural aspects, and the drug management. To each question was assigned a score from 1 to 3. At the same time, blood samples were performed on 270 calves under 6 months of age to evaluate some non-specific immune parameters (serum- amyloid A, haptoglobin, serum lysozyme, complement and bactericidal activities of serum). Results and discussion - According to our classification 15 farms were considered to have good management, 15 an intermediate level of management and 6 mismanagement. The questionnaire also showed that 22 out of 36 companies do not carry out quarantine, only 6 companies make annual checks on the herd even without symptoms. The 67% of farms (n. 24) has reproductive problems, among which the most frequently turns out to be a return to heat (87%). Only 3 companies make use of advice from a nutritionist and only 4 have made the last three therapies based on a complete diagnosis (clinical diagnosis and direct diagnosis of laboratory). It was observed statistically significant association (OR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.6 to 6; p=0.01) between the number of animals in a farm, the enteric diseases and mortality in calves under six months. In companies with a number = 80 of cattle units, the calves had a 3 times greater probability of developing intestinal disease or to die. Regarding the innate immunity parameters we can say that there is no difference between the values registered in the farms with a better or worse management. Conclusions - This shows that despite the selective pressure to which the Marchigiana cattle breed has undergone in the last decade, this bovine still keeps its rustic character that make it suitable to be breed also in the reality in which bacterial and viral loads are particularly high.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 10
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Survey on Biosecurity and Animal Welfare in Twenty-Five Beef Cattle Farms in the Marche Region, Central Italy: Application of the ClassyFarm Checklists
    Alquati, Filippo
    Quagliardi, Martina
    Gavazza, Alessandra
    Roncarati, Alessandra
    Galosi, Livio
    Corradini, Corrado M.
    ANIMALS, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [2] Editorial: Animal welfare and economic sustainability of farms
    Swanson, Janice C.
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 5
  • [3] Animal welfare measured at mink farms in Europe
    Henriksen, Britt I. F.
    Moller, Steen H.
    Malmkvist, Jens
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2022, 248
  • [4] Animal health and welfare on organic farms.
    Horning, B
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1998, 105 (08): : 313 - 321
  • [5] Is there a link between beef quality and animal welfare in traditional beef systems?
    Viegas, Ines
    Vieira, Ana
    Stilwell, George
    Santos, Jose Lima
    Fontes, Magda Aguiar
    NEW MEDIT, 2011, 10 (03): : 17 - 25
  • [6] EVALUATION OF BUFFALO FARMS IN TERMS OF BIOSECURITY AND ANIMAL WELFARE
    Coat, Hatice
    Ermetin, Orhan
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2025, 78 (02): : 300 - 308
  • [7] Use of "demonstration farm" videos to affect attitude change toward animal welfare on beef, egg, and fish farms in China
    Yang, Yifei
    Liu, Tianxu
    Nilsson, Danielle
    Hartcher, Kate
    Shih, Hao-Yu
    Wu, Zhong-Hong
    Liu, Zhong-Ying
    Sinclair, Michelle
    Samayoa, Xochitl
    Henning, Kate
    Descovich, Kris
    OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2023, 52 (04) : 399 - 410
  • [8] Animal welfare assessment in sheep farms befor the application of the Measure 215 "Animal welfare payments" in Tuscany
    Gastaldo, A.
    Benvenuti, M. N.
    Paganelli, O.
    Rossi, P.
    Giuliotti, L.
    LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW, 2015, 21 (03): : 137 - 141
  • [9] Attitudes of Canadian beef producers toward animal welfare
    Spooner, J. M.
    Schuppli, C. A.
    Fraser, D.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2012, 21 (02) : 273 - 283
  • [10] Application of the Welfare Quality® assessment system on European beef bull farms
    Kirchner, M. K.
    Westerath, H. Schulze
    Knierim, U.
    Tessitore, E.
    Cozzi, G.
    Pfeiffer, C.
    Winckler, C.
    ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (05) : 827 - 835