Effect of Hurricanes on Commercial Tomato Crop Production in Southern Florida

被引:0
作者
Ozores-Hampton, Monica [1 ]
Cushman, K. E. [1 ]
Roka, F. [1 ]
French-Monar, R. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Hort Sci, Inst Food & Agr Sci, Southwest Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Immokalee, FL 34142 USA
[2] Texas A&M Syst, Texas AgriLife Extens Serv, Dept Plant Pathol & Microbiol, Amarillo, TX 79106 USA
关键词
Solanum lycopersicum; wind; abiotic stress; risk assessment; DAMAGE; WIND; YIELD; RECOVERY; GROWTH; MILLET; PLANTS; SAND;
D O I
10.21273/HORTTECH.23.4.498
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Several experiments were conducted in commercial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plantings during the 2004-05 and 2005-06 seasons in Immokalee, FL, to understand types of plant damage and potential yield reductions caused by hurricanes. Expt. 1 involved 'Florida 91' tomato seedlings damaged during 2004 by hurricane Frances, 15 days after transplanting (DAT). Individual plants were rated and categorized as best, good, or fair, 34 DAT according to plant size and vigor/severity of injury. Ten plants from each category were removed with roots intact, and dry weights were recorded. During 2005,23 DAT or 8 days after hurricane Wilma, Expt. 2 was conducted to compare rescued and replanted 'Soraya' tomato seedlings. Rescued seedlings were left in place after the hurricane and others were removed and replaced with new transplants of the same variety. Expt. 3 ('Florida 47') and 4 ('BHN 586') involved the contrast of two yield seasons without a hurricane (2004-05) and with hurricane Wilma (2005-06) to estimate the effect of the hurricane damage on tomato 65 and 45 DAT. Fruit was counted, graded by size, and weighed for each experiment from 10 plants/plot. Injury caused by hurricane winds was most evident in Expt. 1 mostly in stem damage below the soil surface showed callous tissue at the site of injury due to plants being whipped around in the planting hole. Plants rated "best" showed greater plant and root dry weight, stem diameter below the injury point, and higher yield of extra large and total marketable fruit at first harvest than plants rated good or fair. Total marketable yields from rescued plants in Expt. 2 were double than that from replanted plants, and fruit matured 20 days earlier for rescued plants indicating that plants injured by Wilma recovered quickly. Hurricane-damaged crops during 2005-06 in Expts. 3 and 4 yielded 60% lower than that of undamaged crops during 2004-05. In the extra large size category, the yields were reduced between 34% and 12% from the previous season. However, hurricane-damaged loss of yield in the extra large category was offset by increased yield in the medium category. It appears that hurricane-damaged plants, when young, were capable of full recovery and normal yields, whereas hurricane-damaged plants, when older at the time injury occurred, were not able to fully recover and eventually produced only half the normal yield.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 504
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bartolo ME, 1998, HORTSCIENCE, V33, P34
[2]   Direct mechanical effects of wind on crops [J].
Cleugh, HA ;
Miller, JM ;
Bohm, M .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 1998, 41 (01) :85-112
[3]   SIMULATED HAIL DAMAGE TO RICE .2. EFFECTS DURING 4 REPRODUCTIVE GROWTH-STAGES [J].
COUNCE, PA ;
WELLS, BR ;
NORMAN, RJ ;
LEONG, J .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1994, 86 (06) :1113-1118
[4]   Recovery from hurricanes and the long-term impacts on perennial tropical fruit crops in south Florida [J].
Crane, JH ;
Schaffer, B ;
Campbell, RJ .
HORTSCIENCE, 2001, 36 (02) :258-263
[5]  
Cushman K, 2005, PROC FL STATE HORTIC, V118, P88
[6]   Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind [J].
Everham, EM ;
Brokaw, NVL .
BOTANICAL REVIEW, 1996, 62 (02) :113-185
[7]  
KAHN BA, 1986, HORTSCIENCE, V21, P1136
[8]   SOIL TILLAGE AND WINDBREAK EFFECTS ON MILLET AND COWPEA .2. DRY-MATTER AND GRAIN-YIELD [J].
LEIHNER, DE ;
BUERKERT, A ;
BANZHAF, J ;
SERAFINI, PG .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (02) :400-405
[9]   WIND AND WINDBLOWN SAND DAMAGE TO PEARL-MILLET [J].
MICHELS, K ;
ARMBRUST, DV ;
ALLISON, BE ;
SIVAKUMAR, MVK .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1995, 87 (04) :620-626
[10]  
Mitchell J.M., 2012, HS1021 EL DAT INF SO