Assessment of low-fidelity fluid-structure interaction model for flexible propeller blades

被引:9
作者
Sodja, Jurij [1 ]
De Breuker, Roeland [1 ]
Nozak, Dejan [2 ]
Drazumeric, Radovan [2 ]
Marzocca, Pier [3 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Aerosp Struct & Mat, Kluyverweg 1, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Mech Engn, Askerceva 6, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] RMIT Univ, Engn Aerosp Engn & Aviat, POB 71, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
关键词
WIND; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2018.03.044
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Low-fidelity fluid-structure interaction model of flexible propeller blades is assessed by means of comparison with high-fidelity aeroelastic results. The low-fidelity model is based on a coupled extended blade-element momentum model and non-linear beam theory which were both implemented in Matlab. High-fidelity fluid-structure interaction analysis is based on coupling commercial computational fluid dynamics and computational structural dynamics codes. For this purpose, Ansys CFX and Ansys Mechanical were used. Three different flexible propeller blade geometries are considered in this study: straight, backward swept, and forward swept. The specific backward and forward swept blades are chosen due to their aeroelastic response and its influence on the propulsive performance of the blade while a straight blade was selected in order to serve as a reference. First, the high-fidelity method is validated against experimental data available for the selected blade geometries. Then the high- and low-fidelity methods are compared in terms of integral thrust and breaking power as well as their respective distributions along the blades are compared for different advancing ratios. In a structural sense, the comparison is performed by analyzing the blade bending and torsional deformation. Based on the obtained results, given the simplicity of the low-fidelity method, it can be concluded that the agreement between the two methods is reasonably good. Moreover, an important result of the comparison study is an observation that the advance ratio is no longer a valid measure of similarity in the case of flexible propeller blades and the behavior of such blades can change significantly with changing operating conditions while keeping the advance ratio constant. This observation is supported by both high- and low-fidelity methods. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 88
页数:18
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] Insight into Rotational Effects on a Wind Turbine Blade Using Navier-Stokes Computations
    Herraez, Ivan
    Stoevesandt, Bernhard
    Peinke, Joachim
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (10): : 6798 - 6822
  • [12] Himmelskamp H., 1947, AERODYNAMISCHE VERSU
  • [13] Hodges D.H., 2011, Introduction to structural dynamics and aeroelasticity
  • [14] Fluid-structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine
    Hsu, Ming-Chen
    Bazilevs, Yuri
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2012, 50 (06) : 821 - 833
  • [15] Design of Efficient Propellers Using Variable-Fidelity Aerodynamic Analysis and Multilevel Optimization
    Kwon, Hyung-Il
    Yi, Seulgi
    Choi, Seongim
    Kim, Keunbae
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2015, 31 (04) : 1057 - 1072
  • [16] Lyon C. A., 1998, SUMMARY LOW SPEED AI, V3
  • [17] Comparative Study of Effects of Sweep and Humps on High-Speed Propeller Blades
    Marinus, Benoit G.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2014, 52 (04) : 739 - 746
  • [18] Nigam N., 2015, MULTI FIDELITY MULTI
  • [19] Piancastelli L, 2015, J ENG APPL SCI, V10, P7250
  • [20] Design of Flexible Propellers with Optimized Load-Distribution Characteristics
    Sodja, Jurij
    Drazumeric, Radovan
    Kosel, Tadej
    Marzocca, Pier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2014, 51 (01): : 117 - 128