Assessment of low-fidelity fluid-structure interaction model for flexible propeller blades

被引:9
作者
Sodja, Jurij [1 ]
De Breuker, Roeland [1 ]
Nozak, Dejan [2 ]
Drazumeric, Radovan [2 ]
Marzocca, Pier [3 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Aerosp Struct & Mat, Kluyverweg 1, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Mech Engn, Askerceva 6, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] RMIT Univ, Engn Aerosp Engn & Aviat, POB 71, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
关键词
WIND; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2018.03.044
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Low-fidelity fluid-structure interaction model of flexible propeller blades is assessed by means of comparison with high-fidelity aeroelastic results. The low-fidelity model is based on a coupled extended blade-element momentum model and non-linear beam theory which were both implemented in Matlab. High-fidelity fluid-structure interaction analysis is based on coupling commercial computational fluid dynamics and computational structural dynamics codes. For this purpose, Ansys CFX and Ansys Mechanical were used. Three different flexible propeller blade geometries are considered in this study: straight, backward swept, and forward swept. The specific backward and forward swept blades are chosen due to their aeroelastic response and its influence on the propulsive performance of the blade while a straight blade was selected in order to serve as a reference. First, the high-fidelity method is validated against experimental data available for the selected blade geometries. Then the high- and low-fidelity methods are compared in terms of integral thrust and breaking power as well as their respective distributions along the blades are compared for different advancing ratios. In a structural sense, the comparison is performed by analyzing the blade bending and torsional deformation. Based on the obtained results, given the simplicity of the low-fidelity method, it can be concluded that the agreement between the two methods is reasonably good. Moreover, an important result of the comparison study is an observation that the advance ratio is no longer a valid measure of similarity in the case of flexible propeller blades and the behavior of such blades can change significantly with changing operating conditions while keeping the advance ratio constant. This observation is supported by both high- and low-fidelity methods. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 88
页数:18
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] DESIGN OF OPTIMUM PROPELLERS
    ADKINS, CN
    LIEBECK, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 1994, 10 (05) : 676 - 682
  • [2] ANSYS, 2013, ANSYS CFX MOD GUID
  • [3] ANSYS, 2017, COUPL FIELD AN GUID
  • [4] ANSYS I. Element Library, 2013, MECH APDL MOD GUID
  • [5] A computational procedure for prebending of wind turbine blades
    Bazilevs, Y.
    Hsu, M-C
    Kiendl, J.
    Benson, D. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2012, 89 (03) : 323 - 336
  • [6] 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: Fluid-structure interaction modeling with composite blades
    Bazilevs, Y.
    Hsu, M. -C.
    Kiendl, J.
    Wuechner, R.
    Bletzinger, K. -U.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2011, 65 (1-3) : 236 - 253
  • [7] Bechet S., 2011, Integration of cfd tools in aerodynamic design of contra-rotating propellers blades
  • [8] Braaten M. E., 2013, 54 AIAA ASME ASCE AH
  • [9] Brizzolara S., 2008, HYDR 8 8 INT C HYDR
  • [10] An evaluation of RANS turbulence modelling for aerodynamic applications
    Catalano, P
    Amato, M
    [J]. AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 7 (07) : 493 - 509