Just how happy is the happy puppet? An emotion signaling and kinship theory perspective, on the behavioral phenotype of children with Angelman Syndrome

被引:36
作者
Brown, WM [1 ]
Consedine, NS [1 ]
机构
[1] Long Isl Univ, Dept Psychol, Intercultural Inst Human Dev & Aging, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.mehy.2004.05.010
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The favored Level of parental investment in a child may differ for genes of maternal and paternal origin in the child. This conflict can be expressed in the phenomenon of genomic imprinting that refers to situations in which the same gene is differentially expressed depending on its parent of origin. Two disorders that show the effects of genomic imprinting - both at 15q11-q13 - are Angelman Syndrome (AS) which is due to the absence of expression of maternally-inherited genes and Prader-With syndromes (PWS) which is due to the absence of expression of paternally-inherited genes. However, although both disorders can arise from the deletion of the same genetic region, the gustatory, behavioral, and affective characteristics of AS and PWS children are remarkably distinct. Recent research inspired by kinship theory has suggested the origins of these phenotypic differences may Lie in the differential investment of each parent's genome in the AS or PWS child. Specifically, it is thought that each set of parental genes have different 'ideas' regarding how the child should behave towards the mother and how much investment they should took to extract. In normal cases, the trade-off between the competing parental genomes produces a behavioral equilibrium in the child. However, in pathological instances, particularly where gene expression is one-sided, the evolved behavioral strategies favored by the contributing genome will dominate the child's behavior. To date, research in the area of genomic conflict in AS and PWS children has primarily focusing on differences in post-natal nutrition-related behaviors. The current paper extends this framework by offering an emotion and evolutionary signaling interpretation of the affective characteristics of AS children. A review of the affective characteristics of the two syndromes (PWS and AS) is presented before kinship and emotions theory are used to examine the functions that differential affect expression may serve in altering maternal investment. We expected that because the ultimate goal of paternal genes is to increase the child rearing burden of mothers, the Angelman behavioral phenotype should exhibit the emotion signaling characteristics that elicit levels of investment more consistent with paternal genetic interests. AS children display more positive, relative to negative, affect expressions (i.e. AS children laugh and smile more frequently than PWS children). In affect signaling theories, positive affect signals (i.e., smiling, laughing) have evolved to manipulate the sensory systems of receivers to increase social resources. In contrast, because the expression of some negative affects may indicate to the mother that the infant is not viable, negative affect expression is characteristically low among AS children. However, AS children may nonetheless have high levels of non-expressed anxiety because of its role in assisting the child (and its paternal genome) to maintain vigilance for changes in investment on the part of the mother. Overall, our kinship and emotion signaling analysis of AS children suggests that their global pattern of affect signaling represents one. manifestation of an array of possible evolved strategies within the parental genome. Specifically, because AS exhibits the effects of paternally-inherited genes unhindered by the expression of maternally-inherited genes, the AS infant manifests a pattern of expression and non-expression that maximize maternal investment and thus paternal fitness. This theory is a significant departure from the standard but erroneous conjecture that a mother and child's inclusive fitness interests
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 385
页数:9
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]  
Afifi WA, 2000, LEA TELECOMMUN, P165
[2]  
Ainsworth M. D. S., 1979, ADV STUD BEHAV, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60032-7
[3]   DISTRIBUTION OF PARTHENOGENETIC CELLS IN THE MOUSE-BRAIN AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON BRAIN-DEVELOPMENT AND BEHAVIOR [J].
ALLEN, ND ;
LOGAN, K ;
LALLY, G ;
DRAGE, DJ ;
NORRIS, ML ;
KEVERNE, EB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1995, 92 (23) :10782-10786
[4]  
Altmann J., 1980, BABOON MOTHERS INFAN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1972, SEXUAL SELECTION DES
[7]  
AVERILL JR, 1994, NATURE EMOTIONS FUND, P99
[8]   Not all laughs are alike: Voiced but not unvoiced laughter readily elicits positive affect [J].
Bachorowski, JA ;
Owren, MJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (03) :252-257
[9]   Toward an integrative perspective on bereavement [J].
Bonanno, GA ;
Kaltman, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (06) :760-776
[10]   WHEN AVOIDING UNPLEASANT EMOTIONS MIGHT NOT BE SUCH A BAD THING - VERBAL-AUTONOMIC RESPONSE DISSOCIATION AND MIDLIFE CONJUGAL BEREAVEMENT [J].
BONANNO, GA ;
HOLEN, A ;
KELTNER, D ;
HOROWITZ, MJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 69 (05) :975-989