Use and Evaluation of a Decision Aid for Patients with T1 Stage Breast Cancer

被引:0
作者
Schulze-Rath, R. [1 ]
Husmann, G. [1 ]
Kaiser, M. [1 ]
Kolpatzik, K. [2 ]
Muenster, E. [3 ]
Nuebling, M. [4 ]
Zeeb, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Med Biometrie Epidemiol & Informat, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[2] AOK Bundesverband, Berlin, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Arbeits Sozial & Umweltmed, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[4] Gesell Empir Beratung mbH, Denzlingen, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; therapy; decision aid; evaluation; survey; LITERATE WOMEN; TYPOLOGY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0029-1185635
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose: Shared decision making using decision aids is becoming more common internationally as patients get more involved in healthcare decisions. In Germany decision aids are not yet widely used. A newly developed decision aid for women with T1 stage breast cancer contains extensive information on both breast-conserving therapy and breast removal to support the patient's decision-making process. We studied how patients and physicians evaluated the decision aid and the options for its use. Material and Methods: The decision aid was presented to patients with a primary diagnosis of breast cancer, members of a self-help group, physicians in specialised hospitals and gynaecologists in private practice. In a cross-sectional study, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire which included questions on the acceptance and implementation of the decision aid in daily routines. The data were analysed descriptively. Results: During the study 18 newly diagnosed patients, 42 members of a self-help group, I I physicians and psycho-oncologists of various hospitals and 150 gynaecologists in private practice participated. The participants evaluated the use of the decision aid positively. Both hospital-based physicians and gynaecologists in private practice should have a role in giving the decision aid to patients. The decision aid is best given to the patient in the period shortly after the diagnosis is confirmed and before the therapy plan is finalised, usually 4-14 days after diagnosis. Gynaecologists in private practice preferred giving the decision aid to patients at the second consultation. Conclusion: The decision aid was evaluated positively. Standardised procedures for use may be helpful to Support the regular utilisation of decision aids in a clinical setting. A translation of the decision aid into the languages spoken by the main immigrant groups in Germany should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 412
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [2] Shared decision making and self-management in multiple sclerosis a consequence of evidence
    Heesen, Christoph
    Koepke, S.
    Richter, T.
    Kasper, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 254 (Suppl 2) : 116 - 121
  • [3] Evidence-based patient choice: A prostate cancer decision aid in plain language
    Holmes-Rovner M.
    Stableford S.
    Fagerlin A.
    Wei J.T.
    Dunn R.L.
    Ohene-Frempong J.
    Kelly-Blake K.
    Rovner D.R.
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 5 (1)
  • [4] Holmes-Rovner Margaret, 2000, Health Expect, V3, P182, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00093.x
  • [5] Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: The satisfaction with decision scale
    HolmesRovner, M
    Kroll, J
    Schmitt, N
    Rovner, DR
    Breer, ML
    Rothert, ML
    Padonu, G
    Talarczyk, G
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1996, 16 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [6] Entertainment education for informed breast cancer treatment decisions in low-literate women: Development and initial evaluation of a patient decision aid
    Jibaja-Weiss, Maria L.
    Volk, Robert J.
    Granchi, Thomas S.
    Neff, Nancy E.
    Spann, Stephen J.
    Aoki, Noriaki
    Robinson, Emily K.
    Friedman, Lois C.
    Beck, J. Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2006, 21 (03) : 133 - 139
  • [7] Preliminary testing of a just-in-time, user-defined values clarification exercise to aid lower literate women in making informed breast cancer treatment decisions
    Jibaja-Weiss, Maria L.
    Volk, Robert J.
    Friedman, Lois C.
    Granchi, Thomas S.
    Neff, Nancy E.
    Spann, Stephen J.
    Robinson, Emily K.
    Aoki, Noriaki
    Beck, J. Robert
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2006, 9 (03) : 218 - 231
  • [8] Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Stacey, Dawn
    Bennett, Carol
    Graham, Ian D.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 73 (03) : 497 - 503
  • [9] LOH A, 2008, DTSCH ARZTEBLATT, V21, P1483
  • [10] Exploring the black box of a decision aid: What information do patients select from an interactive Cd-Rom on treatment options in breast cancer?
    Molenaar, Sjaak
    Sprangers, Mirjam
    Oort, Frans
    Rutgers, Emiel
    Luiten, Ernest
    Mulder, Jan
    van Meeteren, Marjolijn
    de Haes, Hanneke
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2007, 65 (01) : 122 - 130