Barriers to energy efficiency: A comparison across the German commercial and services sector

被引:176
作者
Schleich, Joachim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res Fraunhofer ISI, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
Energy efficiency; Energy consumption; Energy policy; Organizational investment behaviour; Technology diffusion; DECISION-MAKING; MARKET; POLICY; CONSERVATION; ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS; DISCOUNT; FIRMS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Based on a large sample for the German commercial and services sector, this paper econometrically assesses the relevance of various types of barriers to energy efficiency at the sectoral level and across fifteen subsectors. The results at the level of entire sectors suggest that the lack of information about energy consumption patterns and about energy efficiency measures, lack of staff time, priority setting within organizations, and - in particular - the investor/user dilemma are all relevant barriers. Allowing for sector-specific differences in the relevance of these individual barriers yields a more heterogeneous picture. The numbers and types of relevant barriers vary across sub-sectors, and the majority of sub-sectors are subject to relatively few barriers. The statistically most significant barriers are found for the sub-sector of public administrations. These findings are robust, independent of whether the definition of an organization's energy efficiency performance includes only measures that have actually been realized or also those that are being planned. For planned projects. however. organizations appear to underestimate internal priority setting as a barrier to energy efficiency. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2150 / 2159
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) :488-500
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ACT PLAN EN EFF REAL
[3]  
*ARB EN, 2006, AUSW EN DTSCH 1990 2
[4]   Attitudes toward risk and compliance in emission permit markets [J].
Ben-David, S ;
Brookshire, D ;
Burness, S ;
McKee, M ;
Schmidt, C .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2000, 76 (04) :590-600
[5]  
*BMU, 2007, REV NAT ALL 2008 201
[6]  
Brechling V., 1994, Fiscal Studies, V15, P44, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1475-5890.1994.TB00196.X
[7]   Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies [J].
Brown, MA .
ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (14) :1197-1207
[8]  
Butler R., 1993, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT
[9]  
Carr C., 1998, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES, V9, P213, DOI [10.1006/mare.1998.0075, DOI 10.1006/MARE.1998.0075]
[10]  
Coase RH., 1991, The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development, P18