Harmonising methodological choices in life cycle assessment of hydrogen: A focus on acidification and renewable hydrogen

被引:46
作者
Valente, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Iribarren, Diego [1 ]
Dufour, Javier [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IMDEA Energy, Syst Anal Unit, Mostoles 28935, Spain
[2] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Chem & Environm Engn Grp, Mostoles 28933, Spain
关键词
Acidification; Carbon footprint; Harmonisation; Life cycle assessment; Renewable hydrogen; Steam methane reforming; INDIRECT BIOMASS GASIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; BIOHYDROGEN PRODUCTION; ENERGY DEMAND; FUEL; METHANE; SYSTEMS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.101
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The environmental sustainability of hydrogen energy systems is often evaluated through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). In particular, environmental suitability is usually determined by comparing the life-cycle indicators calculated for a specific hydrogen energy system with those of a reference system (e.g., conventional hydrogen from steam methane reforming, SMR-H-2). In this respect, harmonisation protocols for comparative LCA of hydrogen energy systems have recently been developed in order to avoid misleading conclusions in terms of carbon footprints and cumulative energy demand. This article expands the scope of these harmonisation initiatives by addressing a new life-cycle indicator: acidification. A robust protocol for harmonising the acidification potential of hydrogen energy systems is developed and applied to both SMR-H-2 and a sample of case studies of renewable hydrogen. According to the results, unlike other energy systems, there is no correlation between acidification and carbon footprint in the case of hydrogen energy systems, which prevents the estimation of harmonised acidification results from available harmonised carbon footprints. Nevertheless, an initial library of harmonised life cycle indicators of renewable hydrogen is now made available. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19426 / 19433
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Enhancement of dilute bio-ethanol steam reforming for a proton exchange membrane fuel cell system by using methane as co-reactant: Performance and life cycle assessment [J].
Authayanun, Suthida ;
Suwanmanee, Unchalee ;
Arpornwichanop, Amornchai .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (36) :12144-12153
[2]   Feasibility of applying site-dependent impact assessment of acidification in LCA [J].
Bellekom, Sandra ;
Potting, Jose ;
Benders, Rene .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2006, 11 (06) :417-424
[3]   Green methods for hydrogen production [J].
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (02) :1954-1971
[4]  
Dones R., 2007, 5 EC SWISS CTR LIF C
[5]  
European Commission. Joint research centre institute for environment and sustainability, 2011, INT REF CYCL DAT SYS
[6]  
Frischknecht R., 2007, Ecoinvent Rep, V1
[7]  
Goedkoop M., 2016, Introduction to LCA with SimaPro
[8]   Life cycle assessment of two alternative bioenergy systems involving Salix spp. biomass: Bioethanol production and power generation [J].
Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara ;
Iribarren, Diego ;
Susmozas, Ana ;
Dufour, Javier ;
Murphy, Richard J. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 95 :111-122
[9]  
Guinee JB, 2001, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN
[10]   Comparative life cycle assessment of eight alternatives for hydrogen production from renewable and fossil feedstock [J].
Hajjaji, Noureddine ;
Pons, Marie-Noelle ;
Renaudin, Viviane ;
Houas, Ammar .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 44 :177-189