Patient reported outcome measures among patients with vulvar cancer at various stages of treatment, recurrence, and survivorship

被引:17
作者
Alimena, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Sullivan, Mackenzie W. [1 ,2 ]
Philp, Lauren [1 ]
Dorney, Katelyn [1 ]
Hubbell, Harrison [1 ]
del Carmen, Marcela G. [1 ]
Goodman, Annekathryn [1 ]
Bregar, Amy [1 ]
Growdon, Whitfield B. [1 ]
Eisenhauer, Eric L. [1 ]
Sisodia, Rachel Clark [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol, Vincent Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Patient reported outcomes; Vulvar cancer; Survivors; Recurrence; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY; CLINICAL-USE; WOMEN; NEOPLASIA; SURVIVAL; PRIMER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Our goal was to pragmatically describe patient reported outcomes (PROs) in a typical clinic population of vulvar cancer patients, as prior studies of vulvar cancer PROs have examined clinical trial participants. Methods. A prospective PRO program was implemented in the Gynecologic Oncology clinic of a tertiary academic institution in January 2018. Vulvar cancer patients through September 2019 were administered the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire, the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Instrumental and Emotional Support Scales, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Vulvar questionnaire. Binary logistic regressions were performed to determine adjusted odds ratios for adverse responses to individual questions by insurance, stage, age, time since diagnosis, recurrence, radiation, and surgical radicality. Results. Seventy vulvar cancer patients responded to PROs (85.4% response rate). Seventy-one percent were > 1 year since diagnosis, 61.4% had stage I disease, and 28.6% recurred. Publicly insured women had less support and worse quality of life (QOL, aOR 4.15, 95% CI 1.00-17.32, p = 0.05). Women who recurred noted more interference with social activities (aOR 4.45, 95% CI 1.28-15.41, p = 0.019) and poorer QOL (aOR 5.22 95% CI 1.51-18.10, p = 0.009). There were no major differences by surgical radicality. Those >1 year since diagnosis experienced less worry (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.63, p = 0.008). Conclusions. Surgical radicality does not affect symptoms or QOL in vulvar cancer patients, whereas insurance, recurrence, and time since diagnosis do. This data can improve counseling and awareness of patient characteristics that would benefit from social services referral. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 259
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   The use of patient-reported outcome tools in Gynecologic Oncology research, clinical practice, and value-based care [J].
Moss, Haley A. ;
Havrilesky, Laura J. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 148 (01) :12-18
[12]   The Surgeon's Perceived Value of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): An Exploratory Qualitative Study of 5 Different Surgical Subspecialties [J].
Mou, Danny ;
Sisodia, Rachel C. ;
Castillo-Angeles, Manuel ;
Ladin, Keren ;
Bergmark, Regan W. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
del Carmen, Marcela G. ;
Heng, Marilyn .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 275 (03) :500-505
[13]  
National Cancer Institute, CANC STAT FACTS VULV
[14]   A Prospective Study in the Evaluation of Quality of Life After Vulvar Cancer Surgery [J].
Novackova, Marta ;
Halaska, Michael J. ;
Robova, Helena ;
Mala, Ivana ;
Pluta, Marek ;
Chmel, Roman ;
Rob, Lukas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (01) :166-173
[15]   Effects of a psycho-educational programme on health-related quality of life in patients treated for colorectal and anal cancer: A feasibility trial [J].
Ohlsson-Nevo, Emma ;
Karlsson, Jan ;
Nilsson, Ulrica .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2016, 21 :181-188
[16]   A comparison of quality of life between vulvar cancer patients after sentinel lymph node procedure only and inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy [J].
Oonk, M. H. M. ;
van Os, M. A. ;
de Bock, G. H. ;
de Hullu, J. A. ;
Ansink, A. C. ;
van der Zee, A. G. J. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 113 (03) :301-305
[17]   The Impact of Racial, Geographic, and Socioeconomic Risk Factors on the Development of Advanced-Stage Cervical Cancer [J].
Powell, T. Clark ;
Dilley, Sarah E. ;
Bae, Sejong ;
Straughn, J. Michael ;
Kim, Kenneth H. ;
Leath, Charles A. .
JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2018, 22 (04) :269-273
[18]   Minority participation in Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Studies [J].
Scalici, Jennifer ;
Finan, Michael A. ;
Black, Jennifer ;
Harmon, Mary Danner ;
Nicolson, William ;
Lankes, Heather A. ;
Brady, William E. ;
Rocconi, Rodney P. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 138 (02) :441-444
[19]   The unspoken disease: symptom experience in women with vulval neoplasia and surgical treatment: a qualitative study [J].
Senn, B. ;
Gafner, D. ;
Happ, M. B. ;
Eicher, M. ;
Mueller, M. D. ;
Engberg, S. ;
Spirig, R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2011, 20 (06) :747-758
[20]   A patient-reported outcome measure to identify occurrence and distress of post-surgery symptoms of WOMen with vulvAr Neoplasia (WOMAN-PRO) - A cross sectional study [J].
Senn, Beate ;
Eicher, Manuela ;
Mueller, Michael D. ;
Hornung, Rene ;
Fink, Daniel ;
Baessler, Kaven ;
Hampl, Monika ;
Denhaerynck, Kris ;
Spirig, Rebecca ;
Engberg, Sandra .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 129 (01) :234-240