Type III Arch Configuration as a Risk Factor for Carotid Artery Stenting: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Guidelines on Management of Carotid Artery Stenosis

被引:3
作者
Marrocco-Trischitta, Massimiliano M. [1 ,2 ]
Baroni, Irene [1 ]
Vitale, Renato [1 ]
Nava, Giovanni [2 ]
Nano, Giovanni [2 ,3 ]
Secchi, Francesco [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Clin Res Unit, Cardiovasc Dept, Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Vasc Surg Unit, Cardiovasc Dept, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Sci Biomed Salute, Milan, Italy
[4] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Div Radiol, Milan, Italy
关键词
ISCHEMIC-STROKE; SECONDARY PREVENTION; ANATOMIC FACTORS; ENDARTERECTOMY; RECOMMENDATIONS; SOCIETY; UPDATE; ANGIOPLASTY; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Type III arch configuration is frequently reported as a stroke risk factor for carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). We reviewed contemporary guidelines on management of carotid artery stenosis to assess the clinical relevance attributed to this anatomic feature in current clinical practice. Methods: The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify all guidelines on extracranial carotid disease published between January 2008 and March 2020. A total of 435 articles were screened. For multiple guidelines from the same writing group, only the most recent updated version was considered. Eighteen documents were identified for qualitative analysis. Results: Four guidelines specifically reported type III arch as a predictive factor of periprocedural complications after CAS. Two of them also provided a low level of evidence of their recommendation. None of the documents indicated the exact criteria for aortic arch classification. Three different methods to describe type III arch configuration were identified. Conclusions: Type III arch configuration is inconsistently included among stroke risk factors for CAS in contemporary guidelines, and variably defined. Further studies on the level of concordance between the 3 existing definition criteria are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 509
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS [J].
Aboyans, Victor ;
Ricco, Jean-Baptiste ;
Bartelink, Marie-Louise E. L. ;
Bjoerck, Martin ;
Brodmann, Marianne ;
Cohnert, Tina ;
Collet, Jean-Philippe ;
Czerny, Martin ;
De Carlo, Marco ;
Debus, Sebastian ;
Espinola-Klein, Christine ;
Kahan, Thomas ;
Kownator, Serge ;
Mazzolai, Lucia ;
Naylor, A. Ross ;
Roffi, Marco ;
Roether, Joachim ;
Sprynger, Muriel ;
Tendera, Michal ;
Tepe, Gunnar ;
Venermo, Maarit ;
Vlachopoulos, Charalambos ;
Desormais, Ileana .
KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 75 (11) :1065-1160
[2]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[3]  
Barr John D, 2003, J Vasc Interv Radiol, V14, pS321
[4]   Guidelines for patient selection and performance of carotid artery stenting [J].
Bladin, Christopher ;
Chambers, Brian ;
Crimmins, Denis ;
Davis, Stephen ;
Donnan, Geoff ;
Frayne, Judy ;
Levi, Chris ;
Muller, David ;
New, Gishel ;
Denton, Michael ;
Lawrence-Brown, Michael ;
Phatouros, Constantine ;
Scroop, Rebecca ;
Harrington, Tim .
INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2011, 41 (04) :344-347
[5]   Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data [J].
Bonati, Leo H. ;
Dobson, Joanna ;
Algra, Ale ;
Branchereau, Alain ;
Chatellier, Gilles ;
Fraedrich, Gustav ;
Mali, Willem P. ;
Zeumer, Hermann ;
Brown, Martin M. ;
Mas, Jean-Louis ;
Ringleb, Peter A. .
LANCET, 2010, 376 (9746) :1062-1073
[6]  
Bryer A, 2010, SAMJ S AFR MED J, V100, P750
[7]   Clinical and procedural impact of aortic arch anatomic variants in carotid stenting procedures [J].
Burzotta, Francesco ;
Nerla, Roberto ;
Pirozzolo, Giancarlo ;
Aurigemma, Cristina ;
Niccoli, Giampaolo ;
Leone, Antonio Maria ;
Saffioti, Silvia ;
Crea, Filippo ;
Trani, Carlo .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 86 (03) :480-489
[8]   Carotid Artery Stenting in Octogenarians Periprocedural Stroke Risk Predictor Analysis From the Multicenter Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events (CAPTURE 2) Clinical Trial [J].
Chaturvedi, Seemant ;
Matsumura, Jon S. ;
Gray, William ;
Xu, Chuanbo ;
Verta, Patrick .
STROKE, 2010, 41 (04) :757-764
[9]   A Clinical Validation Study of Anatomical Risk Scoring for Procedural Stroke in Patients Treated by Carotid Artery Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study [J].
de Waard, Djurre D. ;
de Vries, Evelien E. ;
Huibers, Anne E. ;
Arnold, Mechteld M. ;
Nederkoorn, Paul J. ;
van Dijk, Lukas C. ;
van Der Lugt, Aad ;
Koudstaal, Peter J. ;
Bonati, Leo H. ;
Brown, Martin M. ;
de Borst, Gert J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 58 (05) :664-670
[10]  
Demarin V, 2010, ACTA CLIN CROAT, V49, P101