Pragmatism, critical realism, and the cognitive value of religion and science

被引:4
作者
Robbins, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, South Bend, IN 46615 USA
来源
ZYGON | 1999年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
critical realism; folk psychology; generic Cartesianism; pragmatism; Timothy van Gelder;
D O I
10.1111/0591-2385.00243
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Pragmatism and critical realism are different vocabularies for talking about the cognitive value of religion and science. Each can be, and has been, used to make the case for cognitive parity between religious and scientific discourse. Critical realism presupposes a particular form of cognitive psychology that entails general skepticism about the external world and forecloses scientific inquiry in the name of a preconceived idea of what the nature of human cognition must be. Thus, of the two, pragmatism is the better vocabulary for fostering mutual understanding between religion and science.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 666
页数:12
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
BARBOUR I, 1990, RELIGION AGE SCI
[2]  
Barbour IanG., 1974, MYTHS MODELS PARADIG
[3]  
DAVIDSON D, 1989, RELATIVISM INTERPRET, P159
[4]  
DENNETT D, 1993, FOLK PSYCHOL PHILOSO, P121
[5]  
DREES WB, 1996, RELIGION SCI NATURAL
[6]  
JAMES W, 1961, SELECTED PAPERS PHIL, P165
[7]  
Peacocke Arthur., 1984, Intimations of Reality: Critical Realism in Science and Religion
[8]  
ROTTY R, 1993, FOLK PSYCHOL PHILOSO, P388
[9]  
SOSKICE J, 1985, METAPHOR RELIGIOUS L
[10]  
van Huyssteen WentzelJ., 1989, THEOLOGY JUSTIFICATI