DOSE-AREA PRODUCT OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY (DSA): ABDOMINAL AORTA AND LOWER LIMB EXAMINATIONS

被引:9
作者
Juszkat, R. [2 ]
Blaszak, M. A. [1 ]
Majewska, N. [2 ]
Majewski, W.
机构
[1] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Fac Phys, Poznan, Poland
[2] K Marcinkowski Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Poznan, Poland
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2009年 / 96卷 / 01期
关键词
dose; dosimetry; medical radiation; health effects; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION PROCEDURES; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; CORONARY-ANGIOGRAPHY; SKIN RADIATION; CARDIOLOGY; ANGIOPLASTY; DOSIMETRY; INJURIES;
D O I
10.1097/01.HP.0000326445.75429.a2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Complex analysis of the fluoroscopy time, exposure time, air kerma values and dose-area product (DAP) has been carried out for a very large group of patients (655) undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for abdominal aorta and lower limb examinations. Measurements have been performed for 206 patients with intravenous (IV DSA) and 449 patients with intra-arterial (IA DSA) contrast administration. The results obtained by the two variations of the DSA technique have been compared. Median DAP values for fluoroscopy are 5.4 (IA DSA) and 3.2 (IV DSA) Gy cm(2) and for exposure are 51.7 and 66.3 Gy cm(2), respectively. A good correlation between the exposure time and DAP has been found for the two types of examinations: IA DSA (r = 0.78) and IV DSA (r = 0.8). However, the correlation of fluoroscopy time and DAP has been insignificant, and the correlation coefficient is 0.39 for IA DSA and 0.63 for IV DSA. The DAP and the time exposure ratio have been significant factors differentiating these two methods. In fluoroscopy patients obtained higher doses in IA DSA, while in exposure doses were higher in IV DSA. Measurements of DAP can be a simple and accurate method for estimation of the stochastic radiation risk to the patients.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A comparison of bolus chasing and static digital subtraction arteriography in peripheral vascular disease [J].
Ashleigh, RJ ;
Hufton, AP ;
Razzaq, R ;
MacDiarmaid-gordon, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (872) :819-824
[2]  
Bakalyar DM, 1997, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V42, P121, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199710)42:2<121::AID-CCD4>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-F
[4]   Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures [J].
Betsou, S ;
Efstathopoulos, EP ;
Katritsis, D ;
Faulkner, K ;
Panayiotakis, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (846) :634-639
[5]   Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology [J].
Bor, D ;
Sancak, T ;
Olgar, T ;
Elcim, Y ;
Adanali, A ;
Sanlidilek, U ;
Akyar, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 77 (916) :315-322
[6]   Variations of patient doses in interventional examinations at different angiographic units [J].
Bor, Dogan ;
Toklu, Tuerkay ;
Olgar, Turan ;
Sancak, Tanzer ;
Cekirge, Saruhan ;
Oenal, Baran ;
Bilgic, Sadik .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (05) :797-806
[7]   Radiation epidemiology and national dose registers [J].
Boyle, P ;
Krewski, D ;
Ashmore, JP ;
Cardis, E ;
Zielinski, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 :S1-S2
[8]   The impact of cardiology on the collective effective dose in the North of England [J].
Broadhead, DA ;
Chapple, CL ;
Faulkner, K ;
Davies, ML ;
McCallum, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (833) :492-497
[9]   Estimation of effective dose in some digital angiographic and interventional procedures [J].
Cruces, RR ;
García-Granados, J ;
Romero, FJD ;
Armas, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (841) :42-47
[10]   Real-time quantification and display of skin radiation during coronary angiography and intervention [J].
den Boer, A ;
de Feijter, PJ ;
Serruys, PW ;
Roelandt, JRTC .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (15) :1779-1784