A Fuzzy Linguistic Extended LibQUAL plus Model to Assess Service Quality in Academic Libraries

被引:15
作者
Cabrerizo, F. J. [1 ]
Lopez-Gijon, J. [2 ]
Martinez, M. A. [3 ]
Morente-Molinera, J. A. [4 ]
Herrera-Viedma, E. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] UNED, Dept Software Engn & Comp Syst, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Lib Sci, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Granada, Dept Social Work & Serv, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[4] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Sci & Articial Intelligence, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Academic library; quality evaluation; LibQUAL; fuzzy linguistic modeling; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; USERS PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION; EVALUATE; SYSTEM; SCALE;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622015500406
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
LibQUAL+ model is the best-known method for the quality evaluation of library services, but it has two major drawbacks. First, to measure the quality, it is devised on a cardinal scale: the service levels range from 1 to 9. However, the standard representation of the concepts used by humans for communication is the natural language and, hence, users should express their judgments by using words instead of numbers. Second, it considers that all users' opinions are equally important. Nevertheless, users do not play an equal role in assessing the service quality, i.e., the opinion given by some users should be more relevant than the opinion provided by others. To solve these drawbacks, we present an extended LibQUAL+ model representing the users' perceptions by using a fuzzy linguistic modeling and taking into account that users' opinions on the library services are not equally important.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 244
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Perez, I. J. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (01) :149-157
[2]   Using LibQUAL+™ to improve services to libraries A report on academic libraries of Iran experience [J].
Asemi, Asefeh ;
Kazempour, Zahra ;
Ashrafi-Rizi, Hasan .
ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2010, 28 (04) :568-579
[3]  
Association of Research Libraries, LIBQUAL CHART LIB SE
[4]   Quality assessment of academic libraries' performance with a special reference to information technology-based services Suggesting an evaluation checklist [J].
Babalhavaeji, Fahimeh ;
Isfandyari-Moghaddam, Alireza ;
Aqili, Seyed Vahid ;
Shakooii, Ali .
ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2010, 28 (04) :592-621
[5]  
Bokos G. D., 1999, P 8 PANH C AC LIB RH, P46
[6]  
Cabrerizo FJ, 2010, INT J INF TECH DECIS, V9, P455, DOI [10.1142/s0219622010003907, 10.1142/S0219622010003907]
[7]   Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks [J].
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Moreno, J. M. ;
Perez, I. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 14 (05) :451-463
[8]  
Calvert PJ, 2001, LIBR TRENDS, V49, P732
[9]  
Cook C, 2001, LIBR TRENDS, V49, P548
[10]   The dimensions of library service quality: A confirmatory factor analysis of the LibQUAL plus instrument [J].
Fagan, Jody Condit .
LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2014, 36 (01) :36-48