The challenge of consciousness with special reference to the exclusive disjunction

被引:0
作者
Antonites, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Fac Humanities, Dept Philosophy, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
来源
HTS TEOLOGIESE STUDIES-THEOLOGICAL STUDIES | 2015年 / 71卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.4102/hts.v71i3.3041
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
The theory of evolution makes sense of the emergence of consciousness. Reduction is not wrong as such, but must not be totalised. The fact that we are star stuff does not preclude the novelty of consciousness. Materialism is naturalism, but naturalism need not be materialism. Neural pathways are relevant but are not the total picture. The central thesis is about David Chalmers's philosophy being based on an exclusive disjunction. An inclusive disjunction is, when explained, more appropriate. Functionalism is appropriate. Thomas Nagel's philosophy on first person ontology can still be maintained. Quantum and complexity theories' hypothesis on consciousness is more compatible with freedom of decision than classical theories.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS REV
[2]  
[Anonymous], NEW YORK REV BOOKS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Rationality and Science: Can Science Explain Everything?
[4]  
Antonites A., 2010, Evolution: Fact or Theory?
[5]   THE REDISCOVERY OF THE MIND - SEARLE,JR [J].
BURTON, RG .
MAN AND WORLD-AN INTERNATIONAL PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1995, 28 (02) :163-174
[6]  
Chalmers D., 1996, The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory
[7]  
Chalmers D.J., 2001, FACING PROBLEM CONSC
[8]  
Copi I.M., 1986, INTRO LOGIC, Vseventh
[9]  
Crane T., 2003, The mechanical mind: A philosophical introduction to minds, machines and mental representation, V2nd
[10]  
Delfgaauw B, 1967, EVOLUTIE FILOSOFIE B, P25