IMPLEMENTATION OF EUNETHTA CORE MODEL® IN LOMBARDIA: THE VTS FRAMEWORK

被引:71
作者
Radaelli, Giovanni [1 ]
Lettieri, Emanuele [1 ]
Masella, Cristina [1 ]
Merlino, Luca [2 ]
Strada, Alberto [2 ]
Tringali, Michele [3 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Reg Lombardia, Gen Hlth Directorate, Milan, Italy
[3] Reg Lombardia, Gen Hlth Directorate, HTA Program, Milan, Italy
关键词
EUnetHTA; EVIDEM; Regional Framework; Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis; Prioritization; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462313000639
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study describes the health technology assessment (HTA) framework introduced by Regione Lombardia to regulate the introduction of new technologies. The study outlines the process and dimensions adopted to prioritize, assess and appraise the requests of new technologies. Methods: The HTA framework incorporates and adapts elements from the EUnetHTA Core Model and the EVIDEM framework. It includes dimensions, topics, and issues provided by EUnetHTA Core Model to collect data and process the assessment. Decision making is instead supported by the criteria and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis technique from the EVIDEM consortium. Results: The HTA framework moves along three process stages: (i) prioritization of requests, (ii) assessment of prioritized technology, (iii) appraisal of technology in support of decision making. Requests received by Regione Lombardia are first prioritized according to their relevance along eight dimensions (e.g., costs, efficiency and efficacy, organizational impact, safety). Evidence about the impacts of the prioritized technologies is then collected following the issues and topics provided by EUnetHTA Core Model. Finally, the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis technique is used to appraise the novel technology and support Regione Lombardia decision making. Conclusions: The VTS (Valutazione delle Tecnologie Sanitarie) framework has been successfully implemented at the end of 2011. From its inception, twenty-six technologies have been processed.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, BMC Health Serv Res, DOI DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-8-270
  • [2] Information created to evade reality (ICER) - Things we should not look to for answers
    Birch, Stephen
    Gafni, Amiram
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (11) : 1121 - 1131
  • [3] The new myth - The social value of the QALY
    Brouwer, Werner
    van Exel, Job
    Baker, Rachel
    Donaldson, Cam
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [4] Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments -: Working group 4 report
    Busse, R
    Orvain, J
    Velasco, M
    Perleth, M
    Drummond, M
    Gürtner, F
    Jorgensen, T
    Jovell, A
    Malone, J
    Rüther, A
    Wild, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 18 (02) : 361 - 422
  • [5] Chandra A., 2011, TECHNOLOGY GROWTH EX
  • [6] Ensuring the Fiscal Sustainability of Health Care Reform
    Chernew, Michael E.
    Sabik, Lindsay
    Chandra, Amitabh
    Newhouse, Joseph P.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [7] Cost effectiveness analysis in health care: contraindications
    Donaldson, C
    Currie, G
    Mitton, C
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7369): : 891 - 894
  • [8] EUnetHTA, 2011, HTA COR MOD
  • [9] EVIDEM, 2011, DEC CRIT CONC BACKGR
  • [10] Health technology assessment in Italy
    Favaretti, Carlo
    Cicchetti, Americo
    Guarrera, Giovanni
    Marchetti, Marco
    Ricciardi, Walter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 : 127 - 133