Interpretation and interview context: examining the General Social Survey name generator using cognitive methods

被引:100
作者
Bailey, S [1 ]
Marsden, PV
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Sociol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Sociol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
General Social Survey; name generator; cognitive methods;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00013-1
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This paper reports on a small (N = 50) study of how survey respondents interpret the General Social Survey (GSS)'s "discuss important matters" name generator. The study involved concurrent think-aloud interviews, in which respondents were debriefed about their thought processes immediately after answering the name generator. Analyses of these responses indicate that some respondents had difficulty in specifying what was meant by the term "important matters"; sizable minorities understood the question in terms of frequency of contact or intimacy rather than in terms of specific social exchanges. Most of those interviewed said that their "important matters" had to do with personal/intimate relationships or other issues of personal life (e.g., finances, hobbies, or health), but appreciable numbers referred to work and political discussions. An interview context experiment revealed that a respondent's definition of "important matters" can be shaped by the substantive content of the preceding parts of an interview schedule. Notwithstanding these findings, the composition of the networks elicited in the study does not appear to vary substantially across interpretations of the name generator. We conclude that the name generator succeeds in measuring ''core'' discussion networks, though with somewhat nonspecific content. Implications for the measurement of personal networks in sample surveys are discussed. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 309
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   SOCIAL NETWORKS, MARITAL-STATUS, AND WELL-BEING [J].
ACOCK, AC ;
HURLBERT, JS .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1993, 15 (03) :309-334
[2]  
BAILEY S, 1997, THESIS HARVARD COLL
[3]  
Beggs JJ, 1996, RURAL SOCIOL, V61, P407, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00626.x
[4]  
Beggs JJ, 1996, RURAL SOCIOL, V61, P306
[5]   THE EFFECT OF NETWORK DENSITY AND HOMOGENEITY ON ATTITUDE POLARIZATION [J].
BIENENSTOCK, EJ ;
BONACICH, P ;
OLIVER, M .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1990, 12 (02) :153-172
[6]   INTERPERSONAL CHOICE AND NETWORKS IN CHINA [J].
BLAU, PM ;
RUAN, D ;
ARDELT, M .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1991, 69 (04) :1037-1062
[7]   PATTERNS IN THE RECALL OF PERSONS IN A RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY [J].
BREWER, DD ;
YANG, BL .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1994, 16 (04) :347-379
[8]   THE SOCIAL STRUCTURAL BASIS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF PERSONS IN MEMORY [J].
BREWER, DD .
HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 1995, 6 (04) :379-403
[9]   A NOTE ON THE GENERAL SOCIAL SURVEYS ERSATZ NETWORK DENSITY ITEM [J].
BURT, RS .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1987, 9 (01) :75-85
[10]   NETWORK ITEMS AND THE GENERAL SOCIAL SURVEY [J].
BURT, RS .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1984, 6 (04) :293-339