Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of soft drink wastewater using anionic and mixed anionic/nonionic surfactants

被引:14
|
作者
Namaghi, Hamed Azizi [1 ,2 ]
Mousavi, Seyed Mahmoud [1 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Engn, Res Ctr Membrane Proc & Membrane, Mashhad, Iran
关键词
MEUF; Mixed surfactants; Critical micelle concentration; Permeate flux; Rejection; SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; CADMIUM IONS; NONIONIC SURFACTANTS; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; METHYLENE-BLUE; MEUF; METHODOLOGY; DYE; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtice.2014.03.015
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In the present study, micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) of soft drink processing wastewater using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) surfactant and mixture of this surfactant with Triton X-100 (TX-100) surfactant is investigated. The experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of operating time, surfactant concentration, transmembrane pressure (TMP), and TX-100/SDS molar ratio on the process performance. The results show that the flux is decreased by increasing SDS concentration, TX-100/SDS molar ratio and operating time and decreasing TMP. Furthermore, increasing TX-100/SDS molar ratio increases the rejections of total dissolved solids (TDS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). (C) 2014 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1850 / 1854
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of dairy wastewater with anionic and nonionic surfactants
    Salmani, Hossein Jalaei
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (28) : 12956 - 12962
  • [2] Removal of cadmium ions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration with mixed anionic-nonionic surfactants
    Huang, Jin-hui
    Zeng, Guang-ming
    Fang, Yao-yao
    Qu, Yun-huan
    Li, Xue
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2009, 326 (02) : 303 - 309
  • [3] Removal of nickel ions from aqueous solution by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration, using mixed anionic-non-ionic surfactants
    Tanhaei, Bahareh
    Chenar, Mandi Pourafshari
    Saghatoleslami, Nasser
    Hesampour, Mehrdad
    Kallioinen, Mari
    Sillanpaa, Mika
    Manttari, Mika
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 138 : 169 - 176
  • [4] Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for the solubilization of various phenolic compounds with different surfactants
    Huang, Jin-Hui
    Zhao, Yong
    Zeng, Guang-Ming
    Peng, Lei
    Li, Xue
    Liu, Liu-Xia
    Li, Fei
    Shi, Li-Xiu
    Yuan, Fang
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 72 (04) : 623 - 631
  • [5] Wastewater treatment of raisins processing factory using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration
    Afifi, Mahnaz
    Golestani, Hossein Alizadeh
    Sharifi, Shadi
    Kiani, Shirin
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2014, 52 (1-3) : 57 - 64
  • [6] Removal characteristics of anionic metals by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration
    Baek, K
    Kim, BK
    Cho, HJ
    Yang, JW
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2003, 99 (03) : 303 - 311
  • [7] Removal of Ni(II) ions from wastewater by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration using mixed surfactants
    Vibhandik, Amar D.
    Marathe, Kumudini V.
    FRONTIERS OF CHEMICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 8 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [8] Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of methylene blue from dye wastewater via a polysulfone hollow fiber membrane
    Huang, Jin-Hui
    Zhou, Chun-Fei
    Zeng, Guang-Ming
    Li, Xue
    Niu, Jing
    Huang, Hua-Jun
    Shi, Liang-Jing
    He, Song-Bao
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2010, 365 (1-2) : 138 - 144
  • [9] Effect of various types of anions and anionic surfactants on the performance of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process in the removal of Pb(II) ions: An optimization with the response surface methodology
    Abhari, Parisa
    Abdi, Sara
    Nasiri, Masoud
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2022, 187 : 332 - 346
  • [10] Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of zinc in synthetic wastewater using spiral-wound membrane
    Rahmanian, B.
    Pakizeh, M.
    Maskooki, A.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2010, 184 (1-3) : 261 - 267