Species spatial distribution analysis using nearest neighbor methods: aggregation and self-similarity

被引:4
作者
Gao, Meng [1 ]
Wang, Xinxiu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, De [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Yantai Inst Coastal Zone Res, Yantai 264003, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Spatial aggregation; Scaling; Occurrence map; Fractal dimension; Barro Colorado Island; Panama; POINT PATTERN-ANALYSIS; SCALING PATTERNS; ABUNDANCE; OCCUPANCY; POPULATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11284-014-1131-8
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Spatial aggregation and self-similarity are two important properties in species spatial distribution analysis and modeling. The aggregation parameter k in the negative binomial distribution model and fractal dimension are two widely used measures of spatial aggregation and self-similarity, respectively. In this paper, we attempt to describe spatial aggregation and self-similarity using nearest neighbor methods. Specifically, nearest neighbor methods are used to calculate k and box-counting fractal dimension of species spatial distribution. First, five scaling patterns of k are identified for tree species in a tropical rainforest on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama. Based on the scaling patterns and the means of the nth nearest neighbor distance (NND), the mean NND of higher ranks can be accurately predicted. Second, we describe how to use the theoretical probability distribution model of the nth NND for a homogeneous Poisson process on regular fractals to estimate the fractal dimension. The results indicate that the fractal dimensions estimated using the nearest neighbor method are consistent with those estimated using the scale-area method for 85 tree species on BCI (abundance a parts per thousand yen 100 individuals and a parts per thousand currency sign 5000 individuals). For other tree species, the breakdown of self-similarity in estimates of fractal dimension causes these two methods to be inconsistent. The applicability of the nearest neighbor method is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 349
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, RARITY
  • [2] [Anonymous], PATTERNS PROCESSES M
  • [3] Buckland S. T., 1993, Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations.
  • [4] DISTANCE TO NEAREST NEIGHBOR AS A MEASURE OF SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS IN POPULATIONS
    CLARK, PJ
    EVANS, FC
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1954, 35 (04) : 445 - 453
  • [5] The impossibility of estimating a negative binomial clustering parameter from presence-absence data: A comment on He and Gaston
    Conlisk, Erin
    Conlisk, John
    Harte, John
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2007, 170 (04) : 651 - 654
  • [6] Diggle P.J., 1983, Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns
  • [7] A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis
    Dungan, JL
    Perry, JN
    Dale, MRT
    Legendre, P
    Citron-Pousty, S
    Fortin, MJ
    Jakomulska, A
    Miriti, M
    Rosenberg, MS
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2002, 25 (05) : 626 - 640
  • [8] Falconer KJ, 1999, Fractal geometry: mathematical foundations and applications
  • [9] Fortin MJ, 2005, SPATIAL ANALYSIS: A GUIDE FOR ECOLOGISTS
  • [10] Detecting spatial aggregation from distance sampling: a probability distribution model of nearest neighbor distance
    Gao, Meng
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 28 (03) : 397 - 405