Online Review of Manuscripts: More haste, less speed?

被引:2
作者
Donovan, Stephen K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Museum Nat Hist, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
peer review; scholarly journals; online peer review; online submission; SUBMISSION;
D O I
10.3138/jsp.40.4.440
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
With the modern culture of online submission and review systems, are peer reviewers being exploited and undervalued? What was once a simple process of accepting to review a paper, receiving it in the mail, and, eventually, returning it to the editor now requires passwords, usernames, printing off a hard copy, electronic reminders, and, tediously, entering all review comments electronically. Why not just say no? The hard work of the review process should be judging the paper, not fighting the program.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 445
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A systematic review of educational online peer-review and assessment systems: charting the landscape [J].
Babik, Dmytro ;
Gehringer, Edward ;
Kidd, Jennifer ;
Sunday, Kristine ;
Tinapple, David ;
Gilbert, Steven .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 72 (03) :1653-1689
[32]   What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis [J].
Herber, Oliver Rudolf ;
Bradbury-Jones, Caroline ;
Boeling, Susanna ;
Combes, Sarah ;
Hirt, Julian ;
Koop, Yvonne ;
Nyhagen, Ragnhild ;
Veldhuizen, Jessica D. ;
Taylor, Julie .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
[33]   Acceptance or decline of requests to review manuscripts: A gender-based approach from a public health journal [J].
Felicitas Dominguez-Berjon, Maria ;
Godoy, Pere ;
Ruano-Ravina, Alberto ;
Angel Negrin, Miguel ;
Vives-Cases, Carmen ;
Alvarez-Dardet, Carlos ;
Bermudez-Tamayo, Clara ;
Jose Lopez, Maria ;
Perez, Gloria ;
Borrell, Carme .
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2018, 25 (02) :94-108
[34]   Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation [J].
Niccolò Casnici ;
Francisco Grimaldo ;
Nigel Gilbert ;
Pierpaolo Dondio ;
Flaminio Squazzoni .
Scientometrics, 2017, 113 :533-546
[35]   Research Conducted in Women Was Deemed More Impactful but Less Publishable than the Same Research Conducted in Men [J].
Murrar, Sohad ;
Johnson, Paula A. ;
Lee, You-Geon ;
Carnes, Molly .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 30 (09) :1259-1267
[36]   What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis [J].
Oliver Rudolf HERBER ;
Caroline BRADBURY-JONES ;
Susanna BÖLING ;
Sarah COMBES ;
Julian HIRT ;
Yvonne KOOP ;
Ragnhild NYHAGEN ;
Jessica D. VELDHUIZEN ;
Julie TAYLOR .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
[37]   Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation [J].
Casnici, Niccolo ;
Grimaldo, Francisco ;
Gilbert, Nigel ;
Dondio, Pierpaolo ;
Squazzoni, Flaminio .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 113 (01) :533-546
[38]   PEER REVIEW PROCESS: ONLINE (EXTERNAL) UNITS (ILEARN) 2014 [J].
Saunders, B. ;
Mewes, C. ;
Ambler, T. ;
Vlachopoulos, P. .
EDULEARN15: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, :2634-2634
[39]   Developing Peer Review of Instruction in an Online Master Course Model [J].
Haubrick, John ;
Levy, Deena ;
Cruz, Laura .
ONLINE LEARNING, 2021, 25 (03) :313-328
[40]   Adapting Peer Review to an Online Course: An Exploratory Case Study [J].
Knight, Linda V. ;
Steinbach, Theresa A. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION-RESEARCH, 2011, 10 :81-100