Similarity-attraction effects in friendship formation: Honest platoon-mates prefer each other but dishonest do not

被引:26
作者
Ilmarinen, Ville-Juhani [1 ]
Lonnqvist, Jan-Erik [2 ]
Paunonen, Sampo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Inst Behav Sci, POB 9, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Swedish Sch Social Sci, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
关键词
Friendship; Dark personality; Similarity-attraction; Homophily; Polynomial regression; Response surface analysis; Honesty; BIG; 5; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION; ASSUMED SIMILARITY; DARK TRIAD; PERCEPTIONS; PREDICTION; NARCISSISM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.040
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Friends tend to be similar on many characteristics, including personality traits. Yet, a real-world similarity attraction effect based on actual personality traits is not supported by current research. One reason for this apparent contradiction could be that dark personality traits have been absent from this literature. In a sample (N = 181) of military cadet freshmen, we investigated homophily ("love of the same") based on the traits identified by the Five-Factor Model (FFM) and two dark personality traits, Manipulativeness and Egotism. We did not find homophily based on the FFM traits. However, platoon-mate dyads with similar levels of trait Manipulativeness or Egotism were more likely to mutually like each other. Furthermore, response surface analyses revealed that homophily for these two traits occurred only at the low, or bright, end of these traits. Our results support arguments derived from evolutionary theory that argue for the importance of trait honesty in friendship formation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 158
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure [J].
Ashton, Michael C. ;
Lee, Kibeom .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 11 (02) :150-166
[2]   The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors A Review of Research and Theory [J].
Ashton, Michael C. ;
Lee, Kibeom ;
de Vries, Reinout E. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2014, 18 (02) :139-152
[3]   Social ecology of similarity: Big schools, small schools and social relationships [J].
Bahns, Angela J. ;
Pickett, Kate M. ;
Crandall, Christian S. .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2012, 15 (01) :119-131
[4]   Trust, Conflict, and Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Balliet, Daniel ;
Van Lange, Paul A. M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2013, 139 (05) :1090-1112
[5]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[6]   Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (03) :373-400
[7]   INTERPERSONAL-ATTRACTION AND ATTITUDE SIMILARITY [J].
BYRNE, D .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 62 (03) :713-&
[8]   Agreement and similarity in self-other perceptions of moral character [J].
Cohen, Taya R. ;
Panter, A. T. ;
Turan, Nazli ;
Morse, Lily ;
Kim, Yeonjeong .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2013, 47 (06) :816-830
[9]   Non-zero-sum collaboration, reciprocity, and the preference for similarity: Developing an adaptive model of close relational functioning [J].
Cole, T ;
Teboul, JCB .
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2004, 11 (02) :135-160
[10]  
Costa PT., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)