Issue Frame Ownership: The Partisan Roots of Campaign Rhetoric

被引:17
作者
Arbour, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, John Jay Coll, New York, NY 10019 USA
关键词
issue agenda; framing; campaign rhetoric; campaign communication; campaign message strategy; PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS; POLITICAL CANDIDATES; PUBLIC-OPINION; CONVERGENCE; AGENDAS; ELECTIONS; DYNAMICS; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/10584609.2013.852639
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Campaigns can shape vote choice decisions by effectively framing issues for voters. I examine how campaigns do this by studying the content of issues appeals in television advertisements from U.S. House and Senate candidates. The use of issue frames is partisan. The two parties develop their own distinct rhetorical strategies on particular issues, showing that each party owns particular issue frames. In addition, campaign messages are sensitive to the partisanship of voters. Campaigns are more likely to use conservative frames in Republican-leaning districts and liberal frames in Democratic-leaning districts. Models of campaign strategy should incorporate not just what issues are discussed, but also the rhetorical choices campaigns make to address these issues.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 627
页数:24
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Anderson N. H., 1981, Foundations of Information Integration Theory
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CANDIDATE CTR CAMPAI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTV346PX8.9
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, News that Matters: Television and American Opinion
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The psychology of attitude
[6]   THE MISMEASURE OF CAMPAIGN SPENDING - EVIDENCE FROM THE 1990 UNITED-STATES HOUSE ELECTIONS [J].
ANSOLABEHERE, S ;
GERBER, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1994, 56 (04) :1106-1118
[7]   RIDING THE WAVE AND CLAIMING OWNERSHIP OVER ISSUES - THE JOINT EFFECTS OF ADVERTISING AND NEWS COVERAGE IN CAMPAIGNS [J].
ANSOLABEHERE, S ;
IYENGAR, S .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1994, 58 (03) :335-357
[8]   Candidate Reputations and Issue Agendas [J].
Arbour, Brian K. .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2013, 41 (06) :1022-1051
[9]  
Azjen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU
[10]   Capitalizing on contention: Issue agendas in U. S. Senate campaigns [J].
Brasher, H .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2003, 20 (04) :453-471