Formative Information Using Student Growth Percentiles for the Quantification of English Language Learners' Progress in Language Acquisition

被引:2
作者
Taherbhai, Husein [1 ]
Seo, Daeryong [1 ]
O'Malley, Kimberly [1 ]
机构
[1] Pearson, San Antonio, TX 78259 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/08957347.2014.905784
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
English language learners (ELLs) are the fastest growing subgroup in American schools. These students, by a provision in the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, are to be supported in their quest for language proficiency through the creation of systems that more effectively measure ELLs' progress across years. In the past, ELLs' progress has been based on students' prior scores measuring the same construct. To disentangle effectiveness from achievement, the reporting has generally targeted mean-group activity. In contrast, student growth percentiles (SGPs) provide a comparison of students' growth with others who have the same achievement score history. By examining the construct measured by an English language proficiency test as manifested in student scores in Speaking, Listening, Reading and Writing, this article outlines the use of SGPs in providing information on how much each student needs to grow, which will allow educators to more effectively apply differential formative instructional strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 213
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Abedi J., 2008, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V27, P17, DOI [10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00125.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2008.00125.X]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Regression Modeling Strategies
[3]   Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers [J].
Ballou, D ;
Sanders, W ;
Wright, P .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2004, 29 (01) :37-65
[4]  
Betebenner D., 2009, EDUC MEAS-ISSUES PRA, V28, P42, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2009.00161.X
[5]  
Betebenner D., 2007, ESTIMATION STUDENT G
[6]  
Braun H., 2005, Using student progress to evaluate teachers: A primer on value-added models
[7]  
Ferrara S., 2006, Educational measurement, V4th, P579
[8]   Student test score reports and interpretive guides: Review of current practices and suggestions for future research [J].
Goodman, DP ;
Hambleton, RK .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2004, 17 (02) :145-220
[9]  
Grady M., 2010, The effect of sample size on student growth percentiles
[10]  
Koenker R., 2005, EC SOC MONOGRAPHS