A prospective comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and 51Cr-EDTA clearance for glomerular filtration rate measurement in 42 kidney transplant recipients

被引:5
作者
Taton, Benjamin [1 ,2 ,5 ]
De La Faille, Renaud [1 ]
Asselineau, Julien [3 ]
Perez, Paul [3 ]
Merville, Pierre [1 ]
Colin, Thierry [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Combe, Christian [1 ,6 ]
Sourbron, Steven [7 ]
Grenier, Nicolas [8 ]
机构
[1] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Nephrol, Grp Hosp Pellegrin, Transplantat,Dialyse, Bordeaux, France
[2] Univ Bordeaux, IMB, UMR CNRS 5251, F-33400 Talence, France
[3] CHU Bordeaux, Pole Sante Publ, Unite Soutien Methodol Rech Clin & Epidemiol, Bordeaux, France
[4] Bordeaux INP, IMB, F-33400 Talence, France
[5] INRIA Bordeaux Sud Ouest, MONC Team, F-33400 Talence, France
[6] Univ Bordeaux, Unite INSERM 1026, Bordeaux, France
[7] Univ Leeds, Div Med Phys, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[8] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Radiol & Imagerie Diagnost & Intervent Adult, Grp Hosp Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
关键词
Functional MRI; Kidney transplant; Glomerular filtration rate; Data accuracy; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; GFR; RENOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) compared with the reference standard technique of urinary clearance of Cr-51-EDTA. Patients and methods: All kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with an indication for non-urgent contrast-enhanced MRI at our institution were prospectively included between 2008 and 2012. Renographies were acquired by low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) then fitted with a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. MR-GFR was compared with reference isotopic measurements using Bland-Altman diagrams, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance rates. Results: Forty-two KTRs (mean age 51.5 years, 26-74) were analyzed. Mean estimated GFR was 48.5 +/- 27 mL/min/1.73m(2) (24-178 mL/min). The mean bias was + 13.2 mL/min (6.4-20.0, +36.9%) ranging from -31.0 mL/min (-41.7%) to + 101.4 mL/min (+89.2%) with a large variability (standard-deviation: 22.3 mL/min; limits of agreement: [-30.6 (-43.3-18.9); + 57.0 (45.3-68.7)]). The ICC was 0.32 (0.02-0.56) and the concordance rate was 28.6% (14.9-42.2). Conclusions: The large variability of MR-GFR compared with the reference technique precludes its use in KTRs, whose anatomical peculiarities make standardization of arterial input function (AIF) difficult.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 215
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条