Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil

被引:79
作者
Zanella, Matheus A. [1 ]
Schleyer, Christian [2 ]
Speelman, Stijn [3 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agr Econ, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] Berlin Brandenburg Acad Sci & Humanities, Ecosyst Serv Res Grp, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Agr Econ, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Payments for Ecosystem Services; Water governance; Participation; Environmental policy; Brazil; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; FRAMEWORK; ADOPTION; FOREST; SUSTAINABILITY; INSTITUTIONS; INFORMATION; MARKETS; EQUITY; HELP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) have become a popular instrument in the last decades and this growing trend is also clearly evident in Brazil. However, challenges related to implementation of these schemes are often underestimated. Any guarantee that a payment will secure or provide such a service is subject not only to underlying ecological uncertainties but also to those entailed by the kinds of social interaction that are inherent to policy implementation. It is argued that the objectives proposed with these instruments can only be attained by ensuring a wide participation of land users. This article advances this topic reporting and discussing evidence on farmer's reasons to participate in three PES-water schemes in Brazil using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research approaches. Results indicate that the diverging opinions regarding how ecosystem services are generated or secured, decentralized governance structures and the involvement of representative bodies in scheme design and implementation are important factors to consider. Furthermore, access to information and general environmental concern were found to be important variables to explain the propensity of farmers to participate. This generates serious policy implications for developing consistent communication and consultation strategies with scheme beneficiaries. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 176
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, THE ECONOMIC INSTITU
[2]   Combining qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate participation in costa rica's program of payments for environmental services [J].
Arriagada, Rodrigo A. ;
Sills, Erin O. ;
Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. ;
Ferraro, Paul J. .
Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2009, 28 (3-5) :343-367
[3]   Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica [J].
Arriagada, Rodrigo A. ;
Ferraro, Paul J. ;
Sills, Erin O. ;
Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. ;
Cordero-Sancho, Silvia .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2012, 88 (02) :382-399
[4]  
Bromley D. W., 1991, ENVIRONMENT AND ECON
[5]  
Bromley D. W., 1989, ECONOMIC INTERESTS A
[6]   Deforestation and forest restoration in Guanacaste, Costa Rica: Putting conservation policies in context [J].
Calvo-Alvarado, J. ;
McLennan, B. ;
Sanchez-Azofeifa, A. ;
Garvin, T. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 258 (06) :931-940
[7]   Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: Case studies from Meso-America [J].
Corbera, Esteve ;
Kosoy, Nicolas ;
Tuna, Miguel Martinez .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2007, 17 (3-4) :365-380
[8]   The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services [J].
Corbera, Esteve ;
Brown, Katrina ;
Adger, W. Neil .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2007, 38 (04) :587-613
[9]   Ecosystem Services: Heed Social Goals [J].
Corbera, Esteve ;
Pascual, Unai .
SCIENCE, 2012, 335 (6069) :655-656
[10]   Factors affecting farmers' participation in agri-environmental measures: A northern Italian perspective [J].
Defrancesco, Edi ;
Gatto, Paola ;
Runge, Ford ;
Trestini, Samuele .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 59 (01) :114-131