Evaluation of Carisbamate for the Treatment of Migraine in a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

被引:25
|
作者
Cady, Roger K. [1 ]
Mathew, Ninan [2 ]
Diener, Hans-Christoph [3 ]
Hu, Peter
Haas, Magali
Novak, Gerald P.
机构
[1] Headache Care Ctr, Banyan Grp, Springfield, MO 65807 USA
[2] Houston Headache Clin, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Klinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
来源
HEADACHE | 2009年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
migraine; prophylaxis; carisbamate; antiepileptic drug; PROPHYLAXIS; CLASSIFICATION; TOPIRAMATE; PREVALENCE; HEADACHE; CRITERIA; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01326.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study explored the dose-response relationship of carisbamate administered at doses of 100 mg per day, 300 mg per day, or 600 mg per day, in the prevention of migraine. Carisbamate ([S]-2-O-carbamoyl-1-o-chlorophenyl-ethanol; RWJ 333369) is a new chemical entity being studied for efficacy as adjunctive therapy in partial onset epilepsy. Because some antiepileptic drugs are also efficacious in migraine, for example, topiramate and valproate sodium, we tested carisbamate in migraine prophylaxis. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, approximately 22-week duration. The primary efficacy variable was the percent reduction from baseline through the double-blind phase in average monthly migraine frequency using a 48-hour rule. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with carisbamate 100, 300, or 600 mg per day, or placebo. Migraine attacks were counted during a prospective 4-week baseline period, which was followed by a 2-week titration period, a 12-week maintenance period, a 1-week medication reduction period, and a 3-week observation period. Patients had an established history of migraine, with or without aura, for at least 1 year and a 3-month history of 3-12 migraine attacks per month. Patients (n = 323) were predominantly women (85%) and white (89%); mean age was 41 years. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the carisbamate groups and placebo (P >= .6) for the median (range) percentage reduction from baseline to end point in average monthly migraine frequency (P value vs placebo): 37% (-250%, 100%) for placebo; 33% (-210%, 100%; P = .7) CRS 100 mg/day; 27% (-100%, 100%; P = .8) CRS 300 mg/day; and 35% (-87%, 100%; P = .6) CRS 600 mg/day. Results for secondary efficacy measures (responder rate, percent reduction in average monthly migraine frequency using the 24-hour rule, and percent reduction in average monthly migraine days) were consistent (P >= .075). The proportion of patients discontinuing because of adverse events was similar for placebo and carisbamate-treated patients (13% each). The most common (occurring in >= 5% of patients) treatment-emergent adverse events in patients treated with carisbamate were fatigue (17%) and nasopharyngitis (13%). Fatigue appeared to be dose related. Carisbamate was not more efficacious in migraine prophylaxis than placebo in this well-controlled study that included a suitable population. However, carisbamate monotherapy was well tolerated at doses up to 600 mg per day.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Memantine for Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine Without Aura: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study
    Noruzzadeh, Rezvan
    Modabbernia, Amirhossein
    Aghamollaii, Vajiheh
    Ghaffarpour, Majid
    Harirchian, Mohammad Hossein
    Salahi, Sarvenaz
    Nikbakht, Nikta
    Noruzi, Nahid
    Tafakhori, Abbas
    HEADACHE, 2016, 56 (01): : 95 - 103
  • [22] Treatment of Comorbid Migraine and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Factorial, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
    Goncalves, Daniela A. G.
    Camparis, Cinara M.
    Speciali, Jose G.
    Castanharo, Sabrina M.
    Ujikawa, Liliana T.
    Lipton, Richard B.
    Bigal, Marcelo E.
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL PAIN, 2013, 27 (04): : 325 - 335
  • [23] Subcutaneous histamine versus botulinum toxin type A in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, double-blind study
    Millan-Guerrero, R. O.
    Isais-Millan, S.
    Barreto-Vizcaino, S.
    Rivera-Castano, L.
    Rios-Madariaga, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 (01) : 88 - 94
  • [24] Comparing Zonisamide With Sodium Valproate in the Management of Migraine Headaches: Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety
    Assarzadegan, Farhad
    Tabesh, Hanif
    Hosseini-Zijoud, Seyed-Mostafa
    Beale, Andrew David
    Shoghli, Arya
    Yazdi, Mahmood Ghafoori
    Mansouri, Behnam
    Hesami, Omid
    Moghadam, Nahid Beladi
    Kasmaei, Hosein Delavar
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (09)
  • [25] Preventive effect of greater occipital nerve block on patients with episodic migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Malekian, Nazila
    Bastani, Pouya B.
    Oveisgharan, Shahram
    Nabaei, Ghaemeh
    Abdi, Siamak
    CEPHALALGIA, 2022, 42 (06) : 481 - 489
  • [26] BMS-927711 for the acute treatment of migraine: A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, dose-ranging trial
    Marcus, Ronald
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    Dodick, David
    Stock, David
    Manos, George
    Fischer, Tanya Z.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2014, 34 (02) : 114 - 125
  • [28] Botulinum Toxin as Preventive Treatment for Migraine: A Randomized Double-Blind Study
    Petri, Susanne
    Toelle, Thomas
    Straube, Andreas
    Pfaffenrath, Volker
    Stefenelli, Ulrich
    Ceballos-Baumann, Andres
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2009, 62 (04) : 204 - 211
  • [29] Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study of homoeopathic prophylaxis of migraine
    Whitmarsh, TE
    ColestonShields, DM
    Steiner, TJ
    CEPHALALGIA, 1997, 17 (05) : 600 - 604
  • [30] KETOROLAC VERSUS MEPERIDINE AND HYDROXYZINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE MIGRAINE HEADACHE - A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL
    DUARTE, C
    DUNAWAY, F
    TURNER, L
    ALDAG, J
    FREDERICK, R
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1992, 21 (09) : 1116 - 1121