Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners' perception of American English approximants

被引:60
作者
Hallé, PA
Best, CT
Levitt, A
机构
[1] Univ Paris 05, CNRS, Expt Psychol Lab, F-75270 Paris, France
[2] Haskins Labs Inc, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[3] Wesleyan Univ, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
[4] Wellesley Coll, Wellesley, MA 02181 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jpho.1999.0097
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The perception of American English (AE) approximant contrasts, /r/-/l/ in particular but also /w/-/r/ and /w/-/j/, has been extensively compared between AE speakers and speakers of Japanese or other languages lacking an /r/-/l/ contrast. The difficulty such listeners encounter with the AE /r/-/l/ contrast, especially those who have had little exposure to spoken English, has most often been explained by reference to the abstract functional contrasts of their native phonological systems, which lack distinctions between rhotic (/r/) and lateral (/l/) consonants. According to that reasoning, speakers of languages who do possess an /r/-/l/ distinction, such as French, should encounter little or no perceptual difficulty with AE /r/-/l/. However, French and AE /r/s differ markedly in their articulatory-phonetic characteristics, which suggests the possibility that French listeners might have some difficulty categorizing AE /r/. The present study therefore examined identification and discrimination of the AE continua /r/-/l/, /w/-/r/, and /w/-/j/ by French participants. As anticipated on the basis of the phonetic differences between the /r/s of the two languages, the French listeners had some perceptual difficulties with AE /r/, which they tended to assimilate as /w/-like. We conclude that the detailed articulatory-phonetic properties of the native versus non-native consonant categories, rather than solely the abstract phonological contrasts of the two languages, account for this perceptual pattern. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 306
页数:26
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Abramson A.S., 1970, P 6 INT C PHON SCI P, P569
[2]  
[Anonymous], J ACOUSTICAL SOC AM
[3]  
[Anonymous], J EXP PSYCHOL HUM PE
[4]  
Archangeli Diana., 1994, Grounded phonology
[5]  
Best C.T., 1995, Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, P171
[6]   EFFECTS OF PHONOLOGICAL AND PHONETIC FACTORS ON CROSS-LANGUAGE PERCEPTION OF APPROXIMANTS [J].
BEST, CT ;
STRANGE, W .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 1992, 20 (03) :305-330
[7]  
BEST CT, 1994, ADV INFANCY RES, V8, P217
[8]  
BLOCH B, 1950, LANGUAGE, V26, P191
[9]   Coarticulatory stability in American English vertical bar r vertical bar [J].
Boyce, S ;
EspyWilson, CY .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 101 (06) :3741-3753
[10]   PERCEPTION AND PRODUCTION OF APPROXIMANT CONSONANTS BY NORMAL AND ARTICULATION-DELAYED PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN [J].
BROEN, PA ;
STRANGE, W ;
DOYLE, SS ;
HELLER, JH .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1983, 26 (04) :601-608