Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

被引:22
作者
Scheflan, Michael [1 ]
Allweis, Tanir M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ben Yehuda, Dafna [3 ]
Lotan, Adi Maisel [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Assuta Med Ctr, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Kaplan Med Ctr, Rehovot, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000003265
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prepectoral implant placement has many potential advantages in immediate breast reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are commonly used in these surgeries. ADM meshing may enhance integration, decrease seroma and infection rates, and reduce surgical costs. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study of 49 women (71 breasts) undergoing immediate, prepectoral, implant-based breast reconstruction with 2:1 meshed, bovine-derived ADM (SurgiMend). Outcomes were compared against those of 77 patients (105 breasts) undergoing a similar procedure but with partial subpectoral implant placement. Results: In the prepectoral group, the mean age was 49.1 years and mean body mass index was 24.7 kg/m(2). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics versus the partial subpectoral control group. Mean follow-up was 18.6 months (prepectoral) and 21.3 months (partial subpectoral). Mean time to drain removal was reduced in the prepectoral group (6.5 versus 8.5 days; P < 0.001). Rates of minor and major complications with prepectoral implant placement were 15.5% and 11.3%, respectively - similar to partial subpectoral placement (15.2% and 14.3%) (overall P = 0.690). Capsular contracture and explantation were associated with radiation therapy, and rates were similar between groups. Conclusions: Prepectoral implant placement with meshed ADM is a safe and reproducible alternative to partial muscle coverage with meshed ADM. Recovery may be easier and animation deformity avoided. It could therefore become the standard of care for implant-based breast reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of one-stage direct-to-implant with acellular dermal matrix and two-stage immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-a cohort study
    Brunbjerg, Mette Eline
    Jensen, Thomas Bo
    Overgaard, Jens
    Christiansen, Peer
    Damsgaard, Tine Engberg
    GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (01) : 207 - 218
  • [22] Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Evaluation of complications and safety
    Kalstrup, Julie
    Willert, Cecilie Balslev
    Weitemeyer, Marie Brinch-Moller
    Chakera, Annette Hougaard
    Holmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz
    BREAST, 2021, 60 : 192 - 198
  • [23] Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits
    Sorkin, Michael
    Qi, Ji
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Kozlow, Jeffrey H.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (06) : 1091 - 1100
  • [24] Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?
    Heine, N.
    Hoesl, V
    Seitz, S.
    Prantl, L.
    Brebant, V
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 305 (04) : 937 - 943
  • [25] Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial
    Dikmans, Rieky E. G.
    Negenborn, Vera L.
    Bouman, Mark-Bram
    Winters, Hay A. H.
    Twisk, Jos W. R.
    Ruhe, P. Quinten
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Smit, Jan Maerten
    Tuinder, Stefania
    Eltahir, Yassir
    Posch, Nicole A.
    van Steveninck-Barends, Josephina M.
    Meesters-Caberg, Marleen A.
    van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J.
    Ritt, Marco J. P. F.
    Mullender, Margriet G.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (02) : 251 - 258
  • [26] Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial
    Lohmander, F.
    Lagergren, J.
    Johansson, H.
    Roy, P. G.
    Frisell, J.
    Brandberg, Y.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (05): : 811 - 820
  • [27] Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Capsular Contracture of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Arm Meta-analysis
    Liu, Jian
    Hou, Jinfei
    Li, Zhipeng
    Wang, Bin
    Sun, Jiaming
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 44 (03) : 735 - 742
  • [28] Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy
    Mishra, Ashutosh
    Kapoor, Rohan
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Saini, Surendra K.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (06) : 1669 - 1670
  • [29] Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction
    Kumar, Nishant Ganesh
    Berlin, Nicholas L.
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Kozlow, Jeffrey H.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (01) : 30 - 40
  • [30] Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review
    Poveromo, Luke P.
    Franck, Philipp
    Ellison, Angela
    Janhofer, David E.
    Asadourian, Paul A.
    Otterburn, David M.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 88 (03) : S205 - S208