Subjective person-organization fit: Bridging the gap between conceptualization and measurement

被引:89
作者
Piasentin, Kelly A. [1 ]
Chapman, Derek S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Psychol, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
subjective person-organization fit; review; conceptual issues; measurement; multidimensional; individual differences;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvb.2006.05.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In this paper, we present a critical examination of the literature on subjective person-organization (P-O) fit and highlight several conceptual and measurement issues that may be perpetuating confusion in this literature. Specifically, we reviewed 46 empirical studies that have measured P-O fit perceptions and identified three primary sources of inconsistency among these studies, including (a) how P-O fit is conceptualized, (b) the operational definition of 'organization,' and (c) the content domain used to assess P-O fit. We discuss several implications of this review, including the potential role that individual differences play in fit perceptions. We also make a case for the development and adoption of uniform, validated measures of P-O fit that incorporate the multidimensional nature of fit. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 221
页数:20
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   JUDGMENTS OF FIT IN THE SELECTION PROCESS - THE ROLE OF WORK VALUE CONGRUENCE [J].
ADKINS, CL ;
RUSSELL, CJ ;
WERBEL, JD .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 47 (03) :605-623
[2]  
AMRAM S, 2004, THESIS CONCORDIA U
[3]  
[Anonymous], J PERSONALITY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, PERSONALITY RES FORM
[5]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN RESOURCE PLANN
[6]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[7]  
BILLSBERRY J, 2004, 64 ANN M AC MAN NEW
[8]  
BRETZ RD, 1993, J VOCAT BEHAV, V43, P310
[9]  
BRETZ RD, 1994, J VOCAT BEHAV, V44, P32
[10]   Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration [J].
Cable, DM ;
Edwards, JR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (05) :822-834