Team Innovation

被引:169
作者
van Knippenberg, Daan [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 4 | 2017年 / 4卷
关键词
team; group; innovation; creativity; diversity; knowledge integration; information elaboration; team climate; team composition; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; MODERATING ROLE; INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITY; GOAL ORIENTATION; CURVILINEAR RELATIONSHIP; MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS; PERSONALITY COMPOSITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; COOPERATIVE GOALS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113240
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Team innovation is of growing importance in research in organizational psychology and organizational behavior as well as organizational practice. I review the empirical literature in team innovation to draw integrative conclusions about the state of the science and to provide a research agenda to move the field forward. The review identifies two main perspectives in team innovation research, the knowledge integration perspective and the team climate perspective. Key conclusions focus on the need to integrate these perspectives to develop an integrative contingency model of the factors providing teams with diverse informational resources and the factors influencing the extent to which teams integrate these resources in a process of information exchange and integration. As part of these integrative efforts, construct consolidation efforts are important to reverse the tendency for proliferation of substantially overlapping moderators and mediators proposed. The review also identifies the contingencies of the relationship between idea development and idea implementation as the most important understudied issue in team innovation research.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 233
页数:23
相关论文
共 120 条
[31]   Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making [J].
De Dreu, CKW ;
West, MA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (06) :1191-1201
[32]   The Paradox of Intragroup Conflict: A Meta-Analysis [J].
de Wit, Frank R. C. ;
Greer, Lindred L. ;
Jehn, Karen A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (02) :360-390
[33]  
Dean T., 2009, Negotiation Conflict Management Research, V2, P20
[34]  
Desivilya HS, 2012, NEGOT C MANAG RES, V3, P28
[35]   Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures [J].
Drach-Zahavy, A ;
Somech, A .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2001, 5 (02) :111-123
[36]   Catching up through developing innovation capability: evidence from China's telecom-equipment industry [J].
Fan, PL .
TECHNOVATION, 2006, 26 (03) :359-368
[37]   Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When [J].
Farh, Jiing-Lih ;
Lee, Cynthia ;
Farh, Crystal I. C. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (06) :1173-1180
[38]   Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in health care [J].
Fay, Doris ;
Borrill, Carol ;
Amir, Ziv ;
Haward, Robert ;
West, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 79 :553-567
[39]   Innovation in Globally Distributed Teams: The Role of LMX, Communication Frequency, and Member Influence on Team Decisions [J].
Gajendran, Ravi S. ;
Joshi, Aparna .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (06) :1252-1261
[40]   Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation [J].
Gibson, Cristina B. ;
Gibbs, Jennifer L. .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2006, 51 (03) :451-495