Evidential risk analysis based on the fuzzy belief TOPSIS

被引:0
作者
Jiang, Jiang [1 ]
Li, Xuan [1 ]
Chen, Yingwu [1 ]
Fang, Debin [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Informat Syst & Management, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Econ & Management Sch, Wuhan, Hubei Province, Peoples R China
来源
2010 THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION (PACIIA2010), VOL IV | 2010年
关键词
Risk analysis and assessment; Evidential risk analysis; Fuzzy belief structure; Belief TOPSIS; REASONING APPROACH; SIMILARITY; NUMBERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Risk analysis and assessment is essentially a synthesis and amalgamation of the empirical and normative, the quantitative and qualitative, and the objective and subjective effort. In order to deal with quantitative and qualitative data, empirical and subjective knowledge, and incomplete, ignorant, fuzzy, vague information in risk analysis and assessment, a novel risk analysis method is proposed in this paper, which refers to evidential risk analysis. The proposed method represents risk by the fuzzy belief structure, aggregates the multiple decision maker opinions using the evidential reasoning approach, and makes risk decision support using belief TOPSIS. The evidential risk analysis process and algorithm is illuminated step by step. Finally, a case study of bridge risk assessment is explored to show validity and applicability of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 142
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], J SCI
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, PROBABILISTIC RISK A
  • [3] Fuzzy risk analysis based on measures of similarity between interval-valued fuzzy numbers
    Chen, Shi-Jay
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    [J]. COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 55 (08) : 1670 - 1685
  • [4] Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach
    Chin, Kwai-Sang
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Poon, Gary Ka Kwai
    Yang, Jian-Bo
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (06) : 1768 - 1779
  • [5] DoD, 2006, RISK MAN GUID DOD AC
  • [6] Haimes Y. Y., 2008, RISK MODELING ASSESS
  • [7] Hwang Ching-Lai, 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D, P58
  • [8] TOPSIS with Belief Structure for Group Belief Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Jiang J.
    Chen Y.-W.
    Tang D.-W.
    Chen Y.-W.
    [J]. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 2010, 7 (3) : 359 - 364
  • [9] Kaplan S., RISK ANAL, V1, P11, DOI [10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6924.1981.TB01350.X]
  • [10] Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Yang, Jian-Bo
    Xu, Dong-Ling
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (03) : 1885 - 1913