Bots in Social and Interaction Networks: Detection and Impact Estimation

被引:29
作者
Mendoza, Marcelo [1 ]
Tesconi, Maurizio [2 ,3 ]
Cresci, Stefano [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Federico Santa Maria, Dept Informat, Ave Espana 1680, Valparaiso, Chile
[2] IIT CNR, Inst Informat & Telemat, Pisa, Italy
[3] Natl Res Council IIT CNR, Inst Informat & Telemat, Via G Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
关键词
Social bots; semi-supervised bot detection; disinformation; user embeddings; label propagation; selective exposure; SPREAD; RISE;
D O I
10.1145/3419369
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The rise of bots and their influence on social networks is a hot topic that has aroused the interest of many researchers. Despite the efforts to detect social bots, it is still difficult to distinguish them from legitimate users. Here, we propose a simple yet effective semi-supervised method that allows distinguishing between bots and legitimate users with high accuracy. The method learns a joint representation of social connections and interactions between users by leveraging graph-based representation learning. Then, on the proximity graph derived from user embeddings, a sample of bots is used as seeds for a label propagation algorithm. We demonstrate that when the label propagation is done according to pairwise account proximity, our method achieves F1 = 0.93, whereas other state-of-the-art techniques achieve F1 <= 0.87. By applying our method to a large dataset of retweets, we uncover the presence of different clusters of bots in the network of Twitter interactions. Interestingly, such clusters feature different degrees of integration with legitimate users. By analyzing the interactions produced by the different clusters of bots, our results suggest that a significant group of users was systematically exposed to content produced by bots and to interactions with bots, indicating the presence of a selective exposure phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 20164 PROJ COMP PROP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, FILTER BUBBLE NEW PE
[3]   Protecting elections from social media manipulation [J].
Aral, Sinan ;
Eckles, Dean .
SCIENCE, 2019, 365 (6456) :858-+
[4]  
Baraniuk C., 2018, Scientific American, P20
[5]   Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate [J].
Broniatowski, David A. ;
Jamison, Amelia M. ;
Qi, SiHua ;
AlKulaib, Lulwah ;
Chen, Tao ;
Benton, Adrian ;
Quinn, Sandra C. ;
Dredze, Mark .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 108 (10) :1378-1384
[6]   Predicting information credibility in time-sensitive social media [J].
Castillo, Carlos ;
Mendoza, Marcelo ;
Poblete, Barbara .
INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 23 (05) :560-588
[7]  
Castillo Carlos, 2011, P 20 INT C WORLD WID, P675, DOI 10.1145/1963405.1963500
[8]   Detecting Automation of Twitter Accounts: Are You a Human, Bot, or Cyborg? [J].
Chu, Zi ;
Gianvecchio, Steven ;
Wang, Haining ;
Jajodia, Sushil .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2012, 9 (06) :811-824
[9]   The limited reach of fake news on Twitter during 2019 European elections [J].
Cinelli, Matteo ;
Cresci, Stefano ;
Galeazzi, Alessandro ;
Quattrociocchi, Walter ;
Tesconi, Maurizio .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06)
[10]   Vaporous Marketing: Uncovering Pervasive Electronic Cigarette Advertisements on Twitter [J].
Clark, Eric M. ;
Jones, Chris A. ;
Williams, Jake Ryland ;
Kurti, Allison N. ;
Norotsky, Mitchell Craig ;
Danforth, Christopher M. ;
Dodds, Peter Sheridan .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07)