Optical coherence tomography study of healing characteristics of paclitaxel-eluting balloons vs. everolimus-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis: the SEDUCE (Safety and Efficacy of a Drug elUting balloon in Coronary artery rEstenosis) randomised clinical trial

被引:62
|
作者
Adriaenssens, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Dens, Jo [3 ]
Ughi, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Bennett, Johan [1 ,2 ]
Dubois, Christophe [1 ,2 ]
Sinnaeve, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Wiyono, Stefanus [1 ,2 ]
Coosemans, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Belmans, Ann [1 ,2 ]
D'hooge, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Vrolix, Mathias [3 ]
Desmet, Walter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Univ Hosp Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[3] ZOL Hosp Genk, Genk, Belgium
关键词
drug-eluting balloon; drug-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis; optical coherence tomography; percutaneous coronary intervention; stent coverage; BARE-METAL STENTS; COATED BALLOON; FOLLOW-UP; VASCULAR BRACHYTHERAPY; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; NEOINTIMAL COVERAGE; ANGIOPLASTY; NEOATHEROSCLEROSIS; ANGIOGRAPHY; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.4244/EIJV10I4A77
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Little is known about the respective healing responses and clinical efficacy and safety of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) and the second generation of drug-eluting stents (DES) when used to treat in-stent restenosis (ISR). In this study, we set out to compare prospectively the healing characteristics, as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT), of DEB versus DES after treatment of ISR in bare metal stents (BMS). Methods and results: Fifty patients with BMS ISR were randomised to treatment with a paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. an everolimus-eluting stent (EES). The primary endpoint was the percentage of uncovered struts, assessed with OCT at nine months, as a marker of vessel wall healing. A mean of 366 +/- 135 and 636 +/- 184 struts were analysed per patient in the DEB and EES groups, respectively. The percentage of uncovered struts per patient was significantly lower with DEB vs. EES (1.4% vs. 3.1%, p=0.025). Mean neointimal hyperplasia area was 2.4 +/- 1.08 mm(2) in DEB vs. 1.92 +/- 0.67 mm(2) in EES (p=0.1806), while the percentage of malapposed struts per patient was very low in both groups (0.2% vs. 0.3%, p=0.699). At nine months, angiographic in-stent MLD (minimum lumen diameter) was lower (2.13 vs. 2.54 mm, p=0.006), while diameter stenosis (26.4 vs. 11.4%, p=0.002), and LLL (0.28 vs. 0.07 mm, p=0.1) were higher after DEB compared to EES. During one-year follow-up, we did not observe differences in the rates of death, TLR (target lesion revascularisation) or stent thrombosis. Conclusions: DEB appears to be associated with better healing characteristics, as assessed by stent strut coverage with OCT, but tended to be slightly less effective compared to EES. These findings give support to the use of either DEB or EES as valuable treatment options for ISR.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 448
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Efficacy of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Catheters and Everolimus-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis The Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Study
    Pleva, Leos
    Kukla, Pavel
    Kusnierova, Pavlina
    Zapletalova, Jana
    Hlinomaz, Ota
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (04)
  • [2] Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis
    Almalla, Mohammad
    Schroeder, Joerg
    Pross, Verena
    Marx, Nikolaus
    Hoffmann, Rainer
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 83 (06) : 881 - 887
  • [3] A Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Any In-Stent Restenosis The DARE Trial
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Boerlage-van Dijk, Kirsten
    Vendrik, Jeroen
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Meuwissen, Martijn
    van Royen, Niels
    Gosselink, A. T. Marcel
    van Wely, Marleen H.
    Dirkali, Atilla
    Arkenbout, E. Karin
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Beijk, Marcel A.
    Vis, M. Marije
    Wykrzykowska, Joanna J.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [4] Optical coherence tomography (OCT) in PCI for in-stent restenosis (ISR): rationale and design of the SEDUCE (Safety and Efficacy of a Drug elUting balloon in Coronary artery rEstenosis) study
    Adriaenssens, Tom
    Dens, Jo
    Ughi, Giovanni
    Coosemans, Mark
    Onsea, Kevin
    Dubois, Christophe
    Sinnaeve, Peter
    Vrolix, Mathias
    Desmet, Walter
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2011, 7 : K100 - K105
  • [5] A Prospective Randomized Trial of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis of Drug-Eluting Stents The RIBS IV Randomized Clinical Trial
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Perez-Vizcayno, Maria Jose
    Cardenas, Alberto
    del Blanco, Bruno Garcia
    Garcia-Touchard, Arturo
    Lopez-Minguez, Jose Ramon
    Benedicto, Amparo
    Masotti, Monica
    Zueco, Javier
    Iniguez, Andres
    Velazquez, Maite
    Moreno, Raul
    Mainar, Vicente
    Dominguez, Antonio
    Pomar, Francisco
    Melgares, Rafael
    Rivero, Fernando
    Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar
    Gonzalo, Nieves
    Fernandez, Cristina
    Macaya, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [6] Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus and in-stent restenosis: Insights from the randomized DARE trial
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Vendrik, Jeroen
    Boerlage-van Dijk, Kirsten
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Meuwissen, Martijn
    van Royen, Niels
    Gosselink, A. T. Marcel
    van Wely, Marleen H.
    Dirkali, Atilla
    Arkenbout, E. Karin
    Piek, Jan. J.
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 93 (02) : 216 - 221
  • [7] Clinical Outcomes in the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of In-Stent Restenosis With Everolimus-Eluting Stents
    Lee, Michael S.
    Yang, Tae
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    Park, Kyung Woo
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    Kim, Moo Hyun
    Dangas, George
    Hermiller, James
    Krucoff, Mitchell
    Rutledge, David
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 26 (09) : 420 - 426
  • [8] Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents for In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Mahmoud, Ahmed N.
    Elgendy, Akram Y.
    Mojadidi, Mohammad K.
    Elbadawi, Ayman
    Eshtehardi, Parham
    Jose Perez-Vizcayno, Maria
    Wayangankar, Siddharth A.
    Jneid, Hani
    Anderson, R. David
    Alfonso, Fernando
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (07) : 612 - 618
  • [9] Vascular healing responses to paclitaxel coated balloons or everolimus eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Insights from optical coherence tomography
    McInerney, Angela
    Salazar, Carlos
    Jose Perez-Vizcayno, Maria
    Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar
    Jimenez-Valero, Santiago
    Brugaletta, Salvatore
    Romaguera, Rafael
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Travieso-Gonzalez, Alejandro
    Jeronimo-Baza, Adrian
    Tirado-Conte, Gabriela
    Fernandez-Ortiz, Antonio
    Escaned, Javier
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Macaya, Carlos
    Gonzalo, Nieves
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2022, 33 (08) : 609 - 617
  • [10] Rationale and design of the RIBS IV randomised clinical trial (drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis)
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Jose Perez-Vizcayno, Maria
    Cardenas, Alberto
    Garcia del Blanco, Bruno
    Garcia-Touchard, Arturo
    Ramon Lopez-Minguez, Jose
    Rivero, Fernando
    Masotti, Monica
    Zueco, Javier
    Cequier, Angel
    Moris, Cesar
    Fernandez-Ortiz, Antonio
    Escaned, Javier
    Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar
    Gonzalo, Nieves
    Fernandez, Cristina
    Macaya, Carlos
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2015, 11 (03) : 336 - 342