Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening

被引:6
作者
Meethal, Najiya Sundus Kadavath [1 ,2 ]
Pel, Johan J. M. [1 ]
Mazumdar, Deepmala [1 ,2 ]
Asokan, Rashima [2 ]
Panday, Manish [2 ]
van der Steen, Johannes [1 ,3 ]
George, Ronnie [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Neurosci, Vestibular & Ocular Motor Res Grp, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Med & Vis Res Fdn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Royal Dutch Visio, Huizen, Netherlands
关键词
Glaucoma screening; Visual field defects; Perimetry; Eye movement perimetry; Saccadic reaction time; Frequency doubling perimetry; Robin's score; Patient preference; VISUAL-FIELD; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-019-04311-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the screening accuracy of an Eye Movement Perimetry (EMP) in comparison with Frequency Doubling Perimetry (FDP) and to investigate the patient preference and perception towards these visual field screening methods.MethodsA total of 104 healthy subjects (mean age (SD) of 48 (14) years) and 73 glaucoma patients (mean age (SD) of 52 (13) years) were recruited. All the participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation including the 24-2 SITA standard protocol on the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). This was followed by the 26-point protocol in EMP and the C-20-1 protocol in FDP. During EMP, all subjects were instructed to fixate a central target and to look at the detected peripheral target, followed by refixation of the central target and Saccadic Reaction Time (SRT) towards each of the seen stimuli was calculated. Next, a questionnaire was administered to evaluate the patient preference and perception towards the perimetry techniques. Mean SRTs and Robin scores were used to plot Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves to determine the screening accuracies. From the questionnaire survey, the frequency distributions of the responses were calculated.ResultsRobin score and SRT were significantly increased in glaucoma patients in comparison with the age-matched healthy subjects (p<0.001). The ROC analysis revealed comparable Area Under the Curve (AUC) values (0.95, p=0.81) with a specificity of 95.2% for FDP and 96.2% for EMP with a sensitivity of 87.7%. Thirty-seven percent of the older age group (40years) and 65% of severe glaucoma patients showed preference for EMP over FDP.ConclusionsThis study results indicate that the customized protocol in EMP provides efficient and rapid means of screening visual field defects in glaucoma, which compared well with FDP. Elderly healthy participants and patients with moderate and severe glaucomatous defectspreferred EMP as it permitted natural reflexive eye movements thereby resembling a real-life test setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1287
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry [J].
Adams, CW ;
Bullimore, MA ;
Wall, M ;
Fingeret, M ;
Johnson, CA .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1999, 76 (08) :582-587
[2]  
Anderson RD, 1999, AUTOMATED STATIC PER, V2nd
[3]   Effect of cataract on frequency doubling perimetry in the screening mode [J].
Casson, RJ ;
James, B .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (01) :23-25
[4]   Anxiety in visual field testing [J].
Chew, Shenton S. L. ;
Kerr, Nathan M. ;
Wong, Aaron B. C. ;
Craig, Jennifer P. ;
Chou, Chi-Ying ;
Danesh-Meyer, Helen V. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 100 (08) :1128-1133
[5]   LENS OPACITIES CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM-II (LOCS-II) [J].
CHYLACK, LT ;
LESKE, MC ;
MCCARTHY, D ;
KHU, P ;
KASHIWAGI, T ;
SPERDUTO, R .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 107 (07) :991-997
[6]   Effect of Refractive Correction on the Accuracy of Frequency-doubling Technology Matrix [J].
Contestabile, Maria T. ;
Perdicchi, Andrea ;
Amodeo, Stefano ;
Paffetti, Lorenzo ;
Iester, Michele ;
Recupero, Santi M. .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (05) :413-415
[7]   The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys [J].
Foster, PJ ;
Buhrmann, R ;
Quigley, HA ;
Johnson, GJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 86 (02) :238-242
[8]   Glaucoma in India: Estimated Burden of Disease [J].
George, Ronnie ;
Ve, Ramesh S. ;
Vijaya, Lingam .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2010, 19 (06) :391-397
[9]   A qualitative investigation into patients' views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring [J].
Glen, Fiona C. ;
Baker, Helen ;
Crabb, David P. .
BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (01)
[10]  
Johnson CA, 1997, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V38, P413