A simple method for Bayesian uncertainty evaluation in linear models

被引:9
|
作者
Wubbeler, Gerd [1 ,2 ]
Marschall, Manuel [1 ,2 ]
Elster, Clemens [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Phys Tech Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Phys Tech Bundesanstalt, Berlin, Germany
关键词
GUM; Bayesian uncertainty evaluation; Monte Carlo method; GUM SUPPLEMENT-1; ALGORITHM; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1088/1681-7575/aba3b8
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) has led to a harmonization of uncertainty evaluation throughout metrology. The simplicity of its employed methodology has fostered the broad acceptance of the GUM among metrologists. However, this simplicity also compromises best practice and does not provide state-of-the-art data analysis. Specifically, metrologists often possess useful prior knowledge about the measurand which cannot be accounted for by the GUM. Bayesian uncertainty evaluation, on the other hand, takes prior knowledge about the measurand as its starting point. While this technique has been successfully applied in several instances in metrology, its broad access for metrologists is still lacking. One reason for this is that application of Bayesian methods and their computation, e.g. by means of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, usually requires statistical skills. In this work, we propose a simple method for Bayesian uncertainty evaluation applicable to measurement models that depend linearly on a single input quantity for which Type A information is available, and several input quantities for which Type B information is given. This category of measurement models covers many uncertainty evaluations in metrology. The approach utilizes a specific class of prior distributions to encode the prior information about the measurand. Explicit guidance is provided on how to choose the parameters of the prior in the light of one's prior knowledge. MCMC methods are not required for the calculation of results; instead, a simple Monte Carlo procedure is developed that allows to draw uncorrelated samples from the posterior distribution, which greatly simplifies convergence assessments. The proposed Bayesian approach allows the treatment of small numbers of observations for a Type A uncertainty evaluation, including the case of only a single observation. Examples are provided that illustrate the proposed approach and corresponding open source Python software is made available.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty Evaluation of pH Measured Using Potentiometric Method
    Wiora, Jozef
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS'2014, VOL 2: TOOLS, ARCHITECTURES, SYSTEMS, APPLICATIONS, 2015, 323 : 523 - 531
  • [22] Summarizing the output of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty evaluation
    Harris, P. M.
    Matthews, C. E.
    Cox, M. G.
    Forbes, A. B.
    METROLOGIA, 2014, 51 (03) : 243 - 252
  • [23] Assessing Bayesian model averaging uncertainty of groundwater modeling based on information entropy method
    Zeng, Xiankui
    Wu, Jichun
    Wang, Dong
    Zhu, Xiaobin
    Long, Yuqiao
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 538 : 689 - 704
  • [24] Sparse Bayesian Estimation of Parameters in Linear-Gaussian State-Space Models
    Cox, Benjamin
    Elvira, Victor
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2023, 71 : 1922 - 1937
  • [25] Bayesian assessment of uncertainty in metrology: a tutorial
    Lira, I.
    Grientschnig, D.
    METROLOGIA, 2010, 47 (03) : R1 - R14
  • [26] Bayesian optical flow with uncertainty quantification
    Sun, Jie
    Quevedo, Fernando J.
    Bolit, Erik
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2018, 34 (10)
  • [27] Bayesian calibration and uncertainty analysis of hydrological models: A comparison of adaptive Metropolis and sequential Monte Carlo samplers
    Jeremiah, Erwin
    Sisson, Scott
    Marshall, Lucy
    Mehrotra, Rajeshwar
    Sharma, Ashish
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
  • [28] Bayesian geological and geophysical data fusion for the construction and uncertainty quantification of 3D geological models
    Olierook, Hugo K. H.
    Scalzo, Richard
    Kohn, David
    Chandra, Rohitash
    Farahbakhsh, Ehsan
    Clark, Chris
    Reddy, Steven M.
    Mueller, R. Dietmar
    GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2021, 12 (01) : 479 - 493
  • [29] Evaluation of Humidity Sensor Calibration Uncertainty by Monte Carlo Method
    Wei, M.
    Wen, C.
    Li, C.
    Miao, J.
    MAPAN-JOURNAL OF METROLOGY SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2024, 39 (03): : 625 - 635
  • [30] A nonmonotone trust region method based on simple quadratic models
    Zhou, Qunyan
    Chen, Jun
    Xie, Zhengwei
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2014, 272 : 107 - 115