The Potential for Water Banking in Australia's Murray-Darling Basin to Increase Drought Resilience

被引:21
作者
Gonzalez, Dennis [1 ]
Dillon, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Page, Declan [1 ]
Vanderzalm, Joanne [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Waite Labs, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Natl Ctr Groundwater Res & Training NCGRT, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Sci & Engn, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
water storage; managed aquifer recharge; drought; resilience; water security; irrigation; agriculture; MANAGED AQUIFER RECHARGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ECONOMICS; RAINFALL; POLICY;
D O I
10.3390/w12102936
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Banking water in aquifers during wet years for long-term storage then recovering it in drought is an application of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) that minimises evaporation losses. This requires a suitable aquifer for long-term storage of banked water and occasional periods when entitlements to surface water are available and affordable. This has been widely practised in Arizona and California but thus far not in Australia, in spite of severe impacts on agriculture, society, and the environment during recent droughts in the Murray-Darling Basin. This preliminary study based on a simple area exclusion analysis using six variables, some on a 90 m grid, over the 1 million km(2) basin produced a first estimate of the order of 2-4 x 10(9) m(3) of additional aquifer storage potential in surficial aquifers close to rivers. For 6 of the 23 catchments evaluated, banking capacity exceeded an average water depth of 0.3 m for the irrigated area. At one prospective site in the Macquarie River catchment in New South Wales, water banking operations at various scales were simulated using 55 years of historical monthly hydrologic data, with recharge and recovery triggered by dam storage levels. This showed that the estimated 300 x 10(6) m(3) additional local aquifer capacity could be fully utilised with a recharge and recovery capacity of 6 x 10(6) m(3)/month, and recharge occurred in 67% of months and recovery in 7% of months. A novel simulation of water banking with recharge and recovery triggered by water trading prices using 11 years of data gave a benefit cost ratio of approximate to 2. Data showed that water availability for recharge was a tighter constraint on water banking than aquifer storage capacity at this location. The analysis reveals that water banking merits further consideration in the Murray-Darling Basin. Firstly, management across hydrologically connected systems requires accounting for surface water and groundwater entitlements and allocations at the appropriate scale, as well as developing equitable economic and regulatory arrangements. Of course, site-specific assessment of water availability and hydrogeological suitability would be needed prior to construction of demonstration projects to support full-scale implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
ABARES, IRR FARMS MURR DARL
[2]  
ACLUMP, 2018, CATCHM SCAL LAND US
[3]   Understanding the Changes in Hydraulic Conductivity Values of Coarse- and Fine-Grained Porous Media Mixtures [J].
Alakayleh, Zuhier ;
Clement, T. Prabhakar ;
Fang, Xing .
WATER, 2018, 10 (03)
[4]  
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2020, 6919 ASCEEWRI, P127, DOI [10.1061/9780784415283, DOI 10.1061/9780784415283]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, AUSTR NZ GUID FRESH
[6]  
[Anonymous], WAT MURR DARL BAS ST
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, GIS MULTICRITERIA DE
[8]  
ATO, CONS PRIC IND CPI RA
[9]  
Barron O., 2011, Climate change impact on groundwater resources in australia: Summary report
[10]  
BOM, 2020, NAT GROUNDW INF SYST