Time delay interferometry with moving spacecraft arrays

被引:123
|
作者
Tinto, M
Estabrook, FB
Armstrong, JW
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[2] CALTECH, Space Radiat Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2004年 / 69卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.69.082001
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Space-borne interferometric gravitational wave detectors, sensitive in the low-frequency (millihertz) band, will fly in the next decade. In these detectors the spacecraft-to-spacecraft light-travel-times will necessarily be unequal, time varying, and (due to aberration) have different time delays on up and down links. The reduction of data from moving interferometric laser arrays in solar orbit will in fact encounter nonsymmetric up- and down-link light time differences that are about 100 times larger than has previously been recognized. The time-delay interferometry (TDI) technique uses knowledge of these delays to cancel the otherwise dominant laser phase noise and yields a variety of data combinations sensitive to gravitational waves. Under the assumption that the (different) up- and down-link time delays are constant, we derive the TDI expressions for those combinations that rely only on four interspacecraft phase measurements. We then turn to the general problem that encompasses time dependence of the light-travel times along the laser links. By introducing a set of noncommuting time-delay operators, we show that there exists a quite general procedure for deriving generalized TDI combinations that account for the effects of time dependence of the arms. By applying our approach we are able to re-derive the "flex-free" expression for the unequal-arm Michelson combinations X-1, and obtain the generalized expressions for the TDI combinations called relay, beacon, monitor, and symmetric Sagnac.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bayesian time delay interferometry for orbiting LISA: Accounting for the time dependence of spacecraft separations
    Page, Jessica
    Littenberg, Tyson B.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 108 (04)
  • [2] Time delay interferometry
    Armstrong, JW
    Estabrook, FB
    Tinto, M
    CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2003, 20 (10) : S283 - S289
  • [3] Time-Delay Interferometry
    Massimo Tinto
    Sanjeev V. Dhurandhar
    Living Reviews in Relativity, 2005, 8
  • [4] Time-Delay Interferometry
    Tinto, Massimo
    Dhurandhar, Sanjeev V.
    LIVING REVIEWS IN RELATIVITY, 2005, 8 (1)
  • [5] Time-Delay Interferometry
    Tinto, Massimo
    Dhurandhar, Sanjeev V.
    LIVING REVIEWS IN RELATIVITY, 2014, 17
  • [6] Geometric time delay interferometry
    Vallisneri, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2005, 72 (04): : 1 - 18
  • [7] Bayesian time delay interferometry
    Page, Jessica
    Littenberg, Tyson B.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 104 (08)
  • [8] Time-delay interferometry
    Massimo Tinto
    Sanjeev V. Dhurandhar
    Living Reviews in Relativity, 2021, 24
  • [9] Time-delay interferometry
    Tinto, Massimo
    Dhurandhar, Sanjeev V.
    LIVING REVIEWS IN RELATIVITY, 2020, 24 (01)
  • [10] Time delay interferometry with a transfer oscillator
    Wu, Hanzhong
    Xu, Mingyang
    Wang, Panpan
    Zhang, Zhenqi
    Fang, Pengcheng
    Tan, Yujie
    Zhang, Jie
    Chen, Qunfeng
    Lu, Zehuang
    Shao, Chenggang
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2023, 48 (01) : 9 - 12